News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Govt to introduce Bill for Ban on cryptocurrencies in next session of Parliament
The Government informed the Supreme Court that an expert panel has recommended complete ban on private cryptocurrencies in the country and the Banning of Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2019, will be introduced in Parliament in the next session.
The inter-ministerial committee, set up to look into the legality of cryptocurrencies, had last month recommended ban on private cryptocurrencies and asked the government to consider launching its own digital money. It, however, said the government should keep an open mind on the potential issuance of cryptocurrencies by RBI.
The draft law also criminalised the use of private cryptocurrencies and recommended fine and imprisonment up to 10 years for anyone dealing in the virtual currency.
A bench led by justice RF Nariman posted the matter for further hearing on Wednesday. Last year, the apex court had refused to stay the RBI’s April 6 circular that had virtually banned banks and financial institutions from providing services to any individual or business dealing in digital currencies within three months. The banks and bourses have closed down their operations since July 6 last year.
The SC is hearing a batch of PILs including one by the Internet and Mobile Association of India challenging the RBI circular that declared cryptocurrency related businesses like virtual currencies, crypto assets, etc as illegal in India. Even RBI’s transfer petition is before it.
Alleging infringement of their right to trade that is guaranteed in the Constitution, the petitions state that RBI lacks the authority to classify crypto asset as legal or illegal assets, but is seeking indirect, colourable means to outlaw crypto assets, which as per the finance ministry do not qualify as ‘legal tender’ in India.
The petition including the one by a group of eleven different representatives from various crypto-related businesses like cryptocurrency exchanges, their shareholders and traders argued that RBI’s circular that mandated banks, e-wallets, and payment gateway providers to withdraw support for cryptocurrency exchanges and other businesses dealing with virtual currencies in India was baseless.
Earlier, RBI had told the Supreme Court that it is necessary to regulate Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency in India as it encouraged “illegal transactions” and impacted international flow of funds.
The expert panel which was constituted on November 2, 2017 said that the private cryptocurrencies are inconsistent with the essential functions of money/currency, hence private cryptocurrencies cannot replace fiat currencies. “There is no underlying intrinsic value of private cryptocurrencies. These… lack all the attributes of a currency. There is no fixed nominal value of these private cryptocurrencies. They neither act as any store of value nor they are a medium of exchange,” the panel stated in its report, noting that since their inception, cryptocurrencies had demonstrated extreme fluctuations in their prices. #casansaar (Source - Financial Express)
The inter-ministerial committee, set up to look into the legality of cryptocurrencies, had last month recommended ban on private cryptocurrencies and asked the government to consider launching its own digital money. It, however, said the government should keep an open mind on the potential issuance of cryptocurrencies by RBI.
The draft law also criminalised the use of private cryptocurrencies and recommended fine and imprisonment up to 10 years for anyone dealing in the virtual currency.
A bench led by justice RF Nariman posted the matter for further hearing on Wednesday. Last year, the apex court had refused to stay the RBI’s April 6 circular that had virtually banned banks and financial institutions from providing services to any individual or business dealing in digital currencies within three months. The banks and bourses have closed down their operations since July 6 last year.
The SC is hearing a batch of PILs including one by the Internet and Mobile Association of India challenging the RBI circular that declared cryptocurrency related businesses like virtual currencies, crypto assets, etc as illegal in India. Even RBI’s transfer petition is before it.
Alleging infringement of their right to trade that is guaranteed in the Constitution, the petitions state that RBI lacks the authority to classify crypto asset as legal or illegal assets, but is seeking indirect, colourable means to outlaw crypto assets, which as per the finance ministry do not qualify as ‘legal tender’ in India.
The petition including the one by a group of eleven different representatives from various crypto-related businesses like cryptocurrency exchanges, their shareholders and traders argued that RBI’s circular that mandated banks, e-wallets, and payment gateway providers to withdraw support for cryptocurrency exchanges and other businesses dealing with virtual currencies in India was baseless.
Earlier, RBI had told the Supreme Court that it is necessary to regulate Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency in India as it encouraged “illegal transactions” and impacted international flow of funds.
The expert panel which was constituted on November 2, 2017 said that the private cryptocurrencies are inconsistent with the essential functions of money/currency, hence private cryptocurrencies cannot replace fiat currencies. “There is no underlying intrinsic value of private cryptocurrencies. These… lack all the attributes of a currency. There is no fixed nominal value of these private cryptocurrencies. They neither act as any store of value nor they are a medium of exchange,” the panel stated in its report, noting that since their inception, cryptocurrencies had demonstrated extreme fluctuations in their prices. #casansaar (Source - Financial Express)
Category : Bitcoins | Comments : 0 | Hits : 398
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments