Budget 2013: Parliamentarians oppose jail for service tax evaders with dues above Rs 50 lakh
Attempts by tax officials to garner power of arrest over individuals guilty of not paying service taxexceeding Rs 50 lakh has run into opposition from members of Parliament (MPs) across parties. Finance Minister P Chidambaram's proposal in the Budget to introduce Section 91, which will empower officials to arrest service tax evaders, has evoked concerns within the ruling party as much as the Opposition over possible misuse of the provision. The measure designed to check tax evasion is likely to lead to harassment of assessees and bring back memories of bad old days of "inspector raj", critics of the proposal have pointed out.
A group of Congress MPs is set to raise the issue with the FM while the main Opposition, the BJP, has decided to demand withdrawal of the proposal when theFinance Bill comes up for discussion. According to the proposal, failure to deposit service tax will result in arrest by an official not below the rank of superintendent of central excise and imprisonment of up to seven years.
"Many small and medium entrepreneurs will be subjected to harassment if the provision is made part of law. The service tax payers in the category do not run manufacturing units," said a Congress minister, who sought anonymity.
The proposal is one of two in the budget this year empowering tax officials to make arrests. The other proposal, with respect to Customs and excise duties, seeks to overcome a Supreme Court ruling in 2011 that evasion of Customs and excise tax cannot be equated with non-cognisable and non-bailable criminal offences, and that an accused cannot be arrested without a warrant. A threemember bench, headed by Justice Altamas Kabir, had ruled that all offences under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Customs Act, 1962, are bailable.
A similar proposal was part of Budget 2012-13, but the government was forced to withdraw it. However, it has found its way into this year's budget as Customs and excise officials insist they need the power of arrest.
Referring to the provision, the leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha, BJP's Arun Jaitley said, "The bail provision was similar to that of the scrapped anti-terror law Pota (Prevention of Terrorism Act). The government was forced to withdraw it."
Jaitley, a former law minister, said the law should distinguish between a genuine defaulter and disputes with a particular levy, adding, "This can be decided only by adjudication."
The government has, however, maintained that tougher rules are needed to check "blatant misuse" of legal provisions by tax assessees. According to the Central Board of Excise & Customs chairperson Praveen Mahajan, only 26 people were arrested while 527 commercial frauds in service tax were detected by her department in 2011-12.
It is up to the government to thrash out a workable solution, said NK Singh, a Rajya Sabha member of the JD (U). "With the progress towards a uniform goods & services tax, there is merit in harmonising provisions of central excise and service tax to bring in uniformity. And in doing so, the provisions with respect to preventive action and arrests need to be suitably calibrated," he said. * (Economic Times)
Category : Budget | Comments : 0 | Hits : 458
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments