News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
About 100 companies get government notice on CSR spend
The Registrar of Companies (RoC) has served warning to about 100 companies over non-disclosure or improper disclosure of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending, sending a strong signal that the government is very serious about compliance.
Regional registrars of companies (RoCs) have shot off notices to companies asking them to furnish further details of spending in some cases or face action that could include prosecution as well, a government official said.
Disclosure of CSR spend by companies has been made mandatory by the Companies Act, 2013.
In some instances companies have been asked to furnish reasons for shortfall in actual CSR expenditure.
In others, including where the board of directors has not mentioned the reasons for not spending the specified amount, show cause notices have been issued.
The RoC has also questioned some companies leaving out dividend income earned during three preceding years while calculating net profit for corporate social responsibility spending. These letters have been issued under Section 206(1) and show cause under Section 450 of the Companies Act.
"...therefore the company and its directors are hereby called upon to show cause within 15 days of this notice that why prosecution should not be launched against them under section 450 of the Act...," according to a copy of the notice seen by ET.
"Discrepancies have been noted in the data provided by the companies some companies that meet the criteria have not even filed the CSR data," the official added.
However, experts also emphasise the need for robust compliance systems.
The CSR norms require companies with at least Rs 5 crore net profit or Rs 1,000 crore turnover or Rs 500 crore in net worth to spend at least 2 per cent of their 3-year average annual net profit on CSR activities in each financial year.
Companies have to constitute a CSR committee of their respective board of directors that formulates and recommends to the board activities that can be taken either by the company on its own or through engagement of an NGO.
Under Section 134 (8) of the Companies Act 2013, a company has to submit its financial statement, board report along with all annexures.
If a company contravenes the provisions of this section, it is liable to be punished with a fine which is not be less than Rs 25,000 but could extend to Rs 25 lakh.
Besides, every officer of the company who is at fault will be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, the Act says.
For the financial year, 2014-15 as many as 460 listed firms disclosed spending Rs 6,337 crore towards CSR activities.
A majority of these companies could not fulfil the minimum 2 per cent criteria. For the financial year 2015-16, a clear picture on the CSR spending would only be available next month.
Recently, a government appointed committee recommended a couple of changes in section 135 of Companies Act that deals with CSR.
The committee has recommended that the net-worth, turnover, profit criteria for determining applicability of CSR provisions be reckoned per the preceding financial year instead of the last three years. (Economic Times)
Regional registrars of companies (RoCs) have shot off notices to companies asking them to furnish further details of spending in some cases or face action that could include prosecution as well, a government official said.
Disclosure of CSR spend by companies has been made mandatory by the Companies Act, 2013.
In some instances companies have been asked to furnish reasons for shortfall in actual CSR expenditure.
In others, including where the board of directors has not mentioned the reasons for not spending the specified amount, show cause notices have been issued.
The RoC has also questioned some companies leaving out dividend income earned during three preceding years while calculating net profit for corporate social responsibility spending. These letters have been issued under Section 206(1) and show cause under Section 450 of the Companies Act.
"...therefore the company and its directors are hereby called upon to show cause within 15 days of this notice that why prosecution should not be launched against them under section 450 of the Act...," according to a copy of the notice seen by ET.
"Discrepancies have been noted in the data provided by the companies some companies that meet the criteria have not even filed the CSR data," the official added.
However, experts also emphasise the need for robust compliance systems.
The CSR norms require companies with at least Rs 5 crore net profit or Rs 1,000 crore turnover or Rs 500 crore in net worth to spend at least 2 per cent of their 3-year average annual net profit on CSR activities in each financial year.
Companies have to constitute a CSR committee of their respective board of directors that formulates and recommends to the board activities that can be taken either by the company on its own or through engagement of an NGO.
Under Section 134 (8) of the Companies Act 2013, a company has to submit its financial statement, board report along with all annexures.
If a company contravenes the provisions of this section, it is liable to be punished with a fine which is not be less than Rs 25,000 but could extend to Rs 25 lakh.
Besides, every officer of the company who is at fault will be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, the Act says.
For the financial year, 2014-15 as many as 460 listed firms disclosed spending Rs 6,337 crore towards CSR activities.
A majority of these companies could not fulfil the minimum 2 per cent criteria. For the financial year 2015-16, a clear picture on the CSR spending would only be available next month.
Recently, a government appointed committee recommended a couple of changes in section 135 of Companies Act that deals with CSR.
The committee has recommended that the net-worth, turnover, profit criteria for determining applicability of CSR provisions be reckoned per the preceding financial year instead of the last three years. (Economic Times)
Category : Corporate Law | Comments : 0 | Hits : 659
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments