CAs, CS' object to notification of Companies Act
Chartered accountants, cost accountants and company secretaries—three classes of professionals recognized under the statute— have protested against the notification of the new companies law, with each saying that they will be hurt by it in various ways.
While chartered accountants are worried about increased responsibility and accountability under the new Act, cost accountants and company secretaries say they will be rendered superfluous at more than 90% of companies, putting corporate governance at risk. However, others are of the view that the new rules will lead to the opening up of fresh opportunities and ensure that audit quality rises.
Chartered accountants are outraged about mandatory joint audits that force one to take responsibility for the other's faults, company secretaries are furious about the ministry having scrapped the requirement for them in private companies, leading to job losses.
Judicial pronouncements in the past have held that auditors are not bloodhounds, said chartered accountant KS Mehta of SS Kothari Mehta & Co.
"It is practically not feasible for an auditor to make his audit more extensive within the limited timeframe allowed by Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India) for adoption of annual accounts than it is already doing," he said. "Companies want to release accounts within 30 days. While joint auditors for the same account may solve the problem to an extent, it is not acceptable by companies as it increases expenses as well as makes coordination more complex."
The new rule making the entire body of partners responsible for any act of negligence by one will have a deleterious effect, he said. "The new rule will only encourage taking up of non-audit work by firms which are not registered and therefore, not subject to the discipline of the ICAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India)," said Mehta.
ICAI has found fault with the rotation of auditors that's now required. "The auditors' rotation has (until) now been restricted to certain class of companies, leaving close to 90% of the companies outside the scope of rotation of auditors," said ICAI president C A K Raghu.
Company secretaries say they are the worst affected. About 93% of India's 9 lakh companies are private, no longer needing the statutory services of a company secretary under the new rules.
This will hit corporate governance, they warned.
"This has made the future dark for 35,000 members of the CS institute and 4 lakh students. On the other hand, corporate governance of a large section of corporates is going to take a back seat," said SK Jain, a Mumbai-based company secretary.
Cost accountants have been protesting against the rules from the draft stage itself, claiming that the scope of their work has also been curbed. The corporate affairs ministry is yet to notify the final rules for cost audit leading to confusion among professionals.
"The section regarding cost audit and records has been notified effective April 1, 2014, but the rules governing the same are not," said Amit Apte, central council member of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India. "We are advising companies to follow the old rules till the time final rules for cost audit are notified."
S Santhana Krishnan, chairman of the corporate laws committee of the chartered accountants' institute and member of the rules of the corporate affairs minstry, admitted that discharging professional functions will become more difficult.
However, the new rules open up new opportunities, he said.
"Some people have looked at the Act as an employment guarantee scheme. It is inappropriate.
Those who believe they have lost opportunities will actually get more opportunities as per the new rules," said Krishnan. For example, cost accountants can now become internal auditors as well.
Company secretaries and CFOs are part of key management personnel. Chartered accountants will get new consulting opportunities such as financial control, corporate governance etc, he said. (Economic Times)
Category : Corporate Law | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1466
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments