Constitutional validity of arrest rules under GST challenged in Supreme Court
PrintListen to this Article
The court took up the matter of arrest provisions and applicability of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to the Customs Act, GST and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and other allied laws on Tuesday and arguments continued till Thursday too.
Appearing for companies, Abhishek Rastogi said in the court that the sheer magnitude of GST arrests that are happening in the country raises various concerns.
There are obvious concerns regarding revenue leakage which is understandable, but there are also concerns about whether or not well accepted, judicially tested, fair and proper procedures are being followed during such arrests, Rastogi, partner at Khaitan & Co., said.
"It is therefore imperative for the judiciary to intervene and ensure that fundamental, constitutional rights of citizens are not trampled on, during such arrests. In the absence of specific oversight of CrPC provisions governing GST arrests, Courts must lay down guidelines for officers to follow, in breach of which citizens can approach jurisdictional courts for appropriate relief," he said.
Assessees have questioned whether they can be branded as "accused" even before investigation and whether an offense can be classified as "non-bailable" without following due process of quantification for determining duty alleged to be evaded.
Arrests therefore cannot precede the process of determination of liability during adjudication process, they said.
The Section 69 of the Central GST Act empowers the GST commissioners to arrest a person if he has “reasons to believe” that the person has claimed fraudulent ITC. Commissioners can order up to five years of arrest of a person who he has reasons to believe is engaged in fraudulent claims.
"Arrest can only follow post-quantification of offense under due process. Provisions were argued especially in light of the phrase "reasons to believe" used in Section 69 of the CGST Act which in the cases before the Supreme Court were conspicuously absent in the Summons Notices or Arrest Warrants issued, " Rastogi said.
The court heard arguments on the concept of 'supply' and 'deemed supply' in respect of such offenses which is the basic assumption behind the arrests made.
The section 16 of the CGST Act, which deals with ITC, clearly said that movement of goods is not necessary for the supply of goods. This is clearly mentioned in the explanation to section 16 (2) of the CGST Act, Rastogi said.
The explanation says, "For the purposes of this clause, it shall be deemed that the registered person has received the goods where the goods are delivered by the supplier to a recipient or any other person on the direction of such registered person, whether acting as an agent or otherwise, before or during movement of goods, either by way of transfer of documents of title to goods or otherwise."
For instance, if the goods are lying in Kolkata and a company in Mumbai asks a dealer in Delhi to supply the goods to him, the goods may not leave Kolkata but the supply would happen if the person gives money to the dealer and gets invoices. If that is not the case, one should not charge even GST on output, but that is not happening, Rastogi said.
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 860
TEST
Dear Taxpayers, 1. GSTN is pleased to inform that an enhanced version of the GST portal would be launched on 3rd May 2024. The effort is to improve user experience and ensure that the information you need is accessible and easy to navigate. 2. Key Enhancements Include (PDF with screenshots attached): i. News and Updates Section: We have introduced a dedicated tab for all news and updates. This section now includes a bet...
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to the central government, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the Goods and Services (GST) Council and the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (its functions have been taken over by the Competition Commission of India) on a petition challenging a Delhi High Court verdict, upholding the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions filed by a real estate company. The petition, filed by Swati Realty, says the high court ...
The delectable Malabar Parota will taste even better with the Kerala High Court ruling that the popular flatbread will attract GST at 5 per cent and not 18 per cent. With this the court has turned down order by the State’s Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) and Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR). Disposing a petition by Kochi-based Modern Food Enterprises, a single judge bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh said if key inputs (cereals, flour, starch, etc) and preparations are s...
A businessman from Delhi was taken into custody by the Noida police for his alleged involvement in a massive Rs 15,000 crore GST fraud that was exposed last year, TOI reported. Tushar Gupta, aged 39 and residing in Tilak Nagar, was arrested as the 33rd suspect in this case. The police revealed that Gupta had exploited input tax credit (ITC) using 35 fake companies, resulting in a loss of Rs 24 crore to the exchequer over the past two years. He was reportedly part of a syndicate that utiliz...
Comments