News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
GST no longer citizen-friendly; calls provisional attachment Draconian - SC
PrintThe Supreme Court on Tuesday slammed the manner in which the Goods and Services Tax was being enforced by tax authorities and observed that the taxman cannot see all businesses as being fraudulent.
The Parliament had aimed to give the GST a citizen-friendly tax structure. But, the purpose of the Act is lost by the manner of enforcement in our country, Justice DY Chandrachud observed.
The bench of Justice Chandrachud and MR Shah was hearing a plea against powers of provisional attachment under the Himachal Pradesh GST Act. The plea was filed by Radha Krishna Industries, alleging that power of attachment under Sec 83 is draconian.
Senior Advocate Puneet Bali and Advocate Surjeet Bhadu appeared for the petitioner company, before the Supreme Court.
Per the Sec 83 of the HP GST Act, during the pendency of tax proceedings, the department can attach any property (including bank accounts and accounts receivable). This is called Provisional Attachment. It is a protective measure used by the tax officers to ensure the satisfaction of a later judgement by the courts.
The apex court hit out at tax officers for raising huge demands without accountability. Tax officers raise huge demands from businesses with no accountability, the court observed. If a Rs 10,000 crore demand is reduced to Rs 1,000 crore by a court it must reflect in the assessment of the tax officer, the court added.
The court further termed provisional attachment as ‘draconian’ and ‘pre-emptive strike’.
“Tax authorities can't start attaching assets unless there's alienation, winding up or liquidation of assets,” Justice Chandrachud added.
The court observed that officers must strike out a balance between protecting government revenue and allowing genuine businesses to operate.
In Jan 2021, the Himachal Pradesh High Court had dismissed the plea seeking quashing of the provisional attachment under Sec 83.
On Tuesday, SC concluded the hearing after listening to the arguments of both sides and reserved its judgment on the issue.
The Parliament had aimed to give the GST a citizen-friendly tax structure. But, the purpose of the Act is lost by the manner of enforcement in our country, Justice DY Chandrachud observed.
The bench of Justice Chandrachud and MR Shah was hearing a plea against powers of provisional attachment under the Himachal Pradesh GST Act. The plea was filed by Radha Krishna Industries, alleging that power of attachment under Sec 83 is draconian.
Senior Advocate Puneet Bali and Advocate Surjeet Bhadu appeared for the petitioner company, before the Supreme Court.
Per the Sec 83 of the HP GST Act, during the pendency of tax proceedings, the department can attach any property (including bank accounts and accounts receivable). This is called Provisional Attachment. It is a protective measure used by the tax officers to ensure the satisfaction of a later judgement by the courts.
The apex court hit out at tax officers for raising huge demands without accountability. Tax officers raise huge demands from businesses with no accountability, the court observed. If a Rs 10,000 crore demand is reduced to Rs 1,000 crore by a court it must reflect in the assessment of the tax officer, the court added.
The court further termed provisional attachment as ‘draconian’ and ‘pre-emptive strike’.
“Tax authorities can't start attaching assets unless there's alienation, winding up or liquidation of assets,” Justice Chandrachud added.
The court observed that officers must strike out a balance between protecting government revenue and allowing genuine businesses to operate.
In Jan 2021, the Himachal Pradesh High Court had dismissed the plea seeking quashing of the provisional attachment under Sec 83.
On Tuesday, SC concluded the hearing after listening to the arguments of both sides and reserved its judgment on the issue.
Category : GST | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1907
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000
Comments