NCLAT Upholds Rs 6,300-Crore CCI Fine On Cement Companies
Listen to this Article
The CMA as well as the companies concerned had appealed against the CCI’s order imposing the fine in the NCLAT, which the two-member bench headed by the chairman justice SJ Mukhopadhaya dismissed saying that they found no merit in their pleas.
The companies have no option now but to appeal against the order in the Supreme Court.
The companies have already paid 10% of the amount charged from them as per the directions of the NCLAT. While they have not made any provision in their books, most of them have shown the amount as contingent liabilities.
The case dates back to 2012 when the CCI imposed the penalty on the 11 cement firms for price cartelisation during 2009-10 and 2010-11. As per the CCI order, these 11 cement firms together control a market share of around 58% and enjoy a position of dominance and indulged in arbitrary increase of cement prices.
Finding them guilty under Section 4 of the Competition Act (abuse of dominance), the CCI had levied a penalty of 50% of the profits of these companies during the period under consideration. Section 27 of the Competition Act allows the competition watchdog to impose a penalty up to three times the net profit of the company in the last three years or 10% of the gross turnover of each year, whichever is higher.
The CCI had passed the order following a probe by Director General of Investigation on a complaint filed by Builders Association of India.
According to the CCI, the cement companies had not utilised their available capacity, thereby reducing supply in the market. which helped them keep cement prices high.
Prior to the CCI order, the Serious Fraud Investigation Office in the ministry of corporate affairs had found three cement firms — UltraTech, ACC and Ambuja — guilty of cartelisation and price fixing. The report had been forwarded to the CCI when it started its own investigation on the Builders Association of India complaint.
As per the CCI order, four cement companies will have to shell out a penalty exceeding Rs 1,000 crore. These include Jaypee Cement, which will pay a penalty of Rs 1,323.60 crore, followed by UltraTech (Rs 1,175.49 crore), Ambuja (Rs 1,163.91 crore) and ACC (Rs 1,147.59 crore). The other companies found guilty are Grasim Cements (now merged with UltraTech Cement), Lafarge India, JK Cement, India Cements, Madras Cements, Century Cement and Binani Cement.
Following the CCI’s order the cement firms had challenged it in the Competition Appellate Tribunal (Compat), which in December 2015 had set aside the penalty and directed the CCI to hear the matter afresh.
However, this setting aside of the order of the CCI was not on merits of the case but on procedure followed by the CCI in deciding the case, which Compat felt was not in consonance with the principles of natural justice. The chief issue highlighted by Compat was that the CCI chairman did not hear the arguments but was party to writing the judgment and signed the same.
Upon Compat’s direction the CCI heard the matter afresh and reiterated the penalty in its fresh order in August 2016. Since later that year Compat got dissolved and all appeals against CCI’s order were supposed to be heard by the NCLAT, the companies concerned and CMA appealed against the order before the appellate tribunal. #casansaar (Source - Financial Express)
Category : General | Comments : 0 | Hits : 561
Retirement fund body EPFO has said it will no longer use Aadhaar as a valid document for proof of date of birth. In an official circular on January 16, the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) said the decision to remove Aadhaar was taken following a directive from the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI). As per the circular, Aadhaar is also being removed from the list of documents for correction in date of birth.
A five-day-long Special Parliament Session will be held from Monday. A Parliamentary Bulletin said, that on the first day a discussion on the Parliamentary Journey of 75 years starting from Samvidhan Sabha - Achievements, Experiences, Memories, and Learnings will be held in Lok Sabha. The Government has listed Bill on the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, and other election commissioners in the upcoming Parliament Session. Apart from this The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, Th...
Artificial intelligence can substitute neither the human intelligence nor the humane element in the adjudicatory process, the Delhi high court has held and said ChatGPT can't be the basis of adjudication of legal or factual issues in a court of law. Justice Prathiba M Singh stated that the accuracy and reliability of AI generated data is still in the grey area and at best, such a tool can be utilised for a preliminary understanding or for preliminary research. The court's observati...
Domain + Website + Hosting + 2 email ids @ Just Rs.3100/- with 30 days Money Back Guarantee. CASANSAAR offers a Golden opportunity for Professionals, where they could create their own stunning website with multiple designs and templates to choose. It will be completely your own space, which is going to be a Dynamic Website and could be edited as per your wish. Now Get 2 Email ID's with Your Own Websi...
The Delhi High Court Monday sought the Centre’s stand in a plea against a notification where chartered accountants, company secretaries and cost accountants have been included among “reporting entities” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula granted time to Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, who appeared for the Centre, to “seek instructions” and listed the ma...


Comments