ICAI director finds NSEL auditor guilty of misconduct
PrintListen to this Article
The matter has now been taken up by the institute’s disciplinary committee and an enquiry is scheduled next month. Responding to a Business Standard email seeking comments, the ICAI spokesperson said, “In respect of the complaint filed against the auditors of National Spot Exchange, it may be mentioned the said complaint has been duly processed in terms of the provisions and procedures prescribed under the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases), Rules, 2007 and the director (discipline) has formed a prima-facie opinion holding the respondent guilty of professional misconduct falling within the meaning of Clauses (5), (6) and (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.”
The disciplinary committee of ICAI “has considered the prima-facie opinion in its meeting held on October 19 and agreed to the same”, the spokesperson added. “Accordingly, it has been decided to proceed further under chapter V of the aforesaid rules for an enquiry by the disciplinary committee. The parties to the complaint have also been informed of the decision of the committee and the enquiry is now scheduled in the middle of December, 2015,” said ICAI.
Mukesh P Shah, partner of the audit firm Mukesh P Shah & Co, did not respond to an email seeking comments sent on Monday. The role of auditors in the payment crisis, which blew up after the discovery that there were not enough goods at NSEL godowns across the country to back the contracts traded on its platform, has come under the scanner of various agencies.
A high-level government team under the then economic affairs secretary Arvind Mayaram, set up by the finance minister in August 2013 to probe the NSEL crisis, had reported “possible violations” by entities such as “auditors in due-diligence”. The panel, which gave its recommendations on September 20, 2013, said action needed to be initiated over “failure to furnish a true and fair view of the state of affairs at NSEL in its balance sheet for the financial year ended March 2013”.
A day after this report was given, on September 21, 2013, Mukesh P Shah & Co informed the company that the accounts of FY13 could not be relied on. When Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, the auditor of NSEL’s parent, Financial Technologies (India) Ltd, or FTIL, came to know about this, it informed FTIL that accounts of the parent, too, could not be relied on.
On September 24, a day before the scheduled annual general meeting (AGM), FTIL informed the exchanges of these developments. It, then, had to withdraw certain resolutions related to the approval of accounts and re-appointment of Deloitte as auditor, from the AGM.
Business Standard had on Monday reported that IGL Finance, an investor aggrieved by the NSEL crisis, had moved the Delhi High Court alleging contempt of court by the institute. It had alleged the institute was not following the court orders of May 5 in the matter.
The institute said: “In respect of the contempt petition filed in the matter, it may be stated that in terms of the decision of the high court at Delhi on a petition filed by IGL Finance against the ICAI, necessary compliance in terms of the order of the high court has been made as above and there is no scope for contempt of court.”
Further, since the contempt petition alleged to have been filed has not been listed yet before the court and as and when the same is listed, the correct facts shall be brought to the notice of the court and the ICAI shall press for dismissal of the contempt petition, the ICAI spokesperson added.
However, an IGL Finance executive said the details were shared by the institute only after the contempt proceedings were initiated. The institute through its disciplinary mechanism is committed to expediting disciplinary cases involving its members in order to uphold the highest ethical standards conforming to the code of conduct, the ICAI spokesperson added. (Business Standard)
Category : ICAI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 914
The CA Institute has proceeded and notified its revised exam dates (announced on March 19) for the intermediate course examination and final examination despite a pending Supreme Court hearing slated for April 29 on postponement plea filed by some CA Students. An ICAI notification—gazetted on April 25 —showed that the intermediate course exams will be held on May 3, 5 & 9 (Group I) and May 11, 15 and 17 (Group II). The final exams are scheduled for May 2, 4 and 8 (Group ...
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has found gross negligence by edtech firm Byju's auditors, ICAI president Ranjeet Kumar Agarwal said on Wednesday. "Our inspection has found gross negligence on accounting practices by individual auditors of Byju's and accordingly we have recommended to the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB) to take punitive actions on auditors concerned," Agarwal told news agency PTI. Agarwal said, "The FRRB wil...
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided premises linked to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary Bibhav Kumar, and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP, Past President of ICAI Sh.ND Gupta in connection with a money laundering probe related to the Jal Board case. The central probe agency had last month arrested Jagdish Kumar Arora, the former chief engineer of the Delhi Jal Board. The probe agency claims that Arora awarded a contract worth Rs 38 crore to NKG Infrastru...
A bench of justice Bharav D Karia had observed that the activity of a CA includes that of accounting, auditing, refereeing, receivers, arbitrators and special commissioners as prescribed by the ICAI to be carried out on-premises and at places of managing partner may determine The Gujarat high court has ruled that a Chartered Accountancy (CA) firm should be classified as a professional establishment rather than a shop, commercial or retail entity and as a result, its employees are deemed ineli...
Notice Sent to Kumar Vishwas by Advocate (CA) Dr. Suneel Maggo for his Derogatory Remarks against Professionals (Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries). We had discussed the matter with Advocate Suneel Maggo and the same has been uploaded on the youtube but on the pressure of Kumar Vishwas, Video has been removed 2 times. In his notice to Kumar Vishwas, He asked for Sorry to the Professional else Next Defemation Notice to Kumar Vishwas for his Derogatory Remarks against Chartered A...
Comments