ICAI raises concerns on fraud reporting in Companies Act
Listen to this Article
The accounting regulator Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has raised concerns over the demand of reporting every fraud to the Central government by auditors within 60 days under the new Companies Act.
The ICAI has also urged the ministry of corporate affairs to relax the cap on number of audits per auditor in a representation to the ministry.
“Reporting all frauds, even the ones which are as small as Rs 1,000 is our responsibility. It is a huge responsibility. Reporting all the frauds would be difficult as frauds can be committed by management or even external forces. How can we detect all of them?” ICAI president K Raghu told The Indian Express.
“This is for the first time that a such a responsibility of reporting on frauds directly to the central government has been given to statutory auditors, in addition to their existing reporting requirements to shareholders.” He further added that the institute has told the ministry that there should be a framework for fraud detection which should be in line with the existing auditing standards, as issued by the ICAI.
According to Auditing Standard 240, “In an audit, the auditor does not guarantee that material mis-statements, whether from fraud or error, will be detected.”
Also, the auditor is required to communicate the fraud information to management, and “those charged with governance and, in some circumstances, when so required by the laws and regulations, to regulatory and enforcement authorities also”. However, there is no requirement of directly reporting to the Central government.
“We have set up an expert committee to work on a guidance note on fraud to educate our members.This reporting requirement is quiet demanding from statutory auditors’ perspective. Across the world, fraud detection is a highly specialised job,” Raghu said.
According to Section 143(12) of the Companies Act, if an auditor comes across an offence involving fraud being committed against the company by management or employees, it will have to be reported to the Central government within 60 days. Also, before reporting it to the government, the incident would have to be brought to the notice of board or audit committee of the company and seek their reply within 45 days.
ICAI has also said that the cap of 20 audits per auditor should be relaxed to exclude private limited companies, small businesses and one person companies as the cap would cause undue hardship to both companies and auditors, and bring about increased costs.(Indian Express)
Category : ICAI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 862
The CA Institute has proceeded and notified its revised exam dates (announced on March 19) for the intermediate course examination and final examination despite a pending Supreme Court hearing slated for April 29 on postponement plea filed by some CA Students. An ICAI notification—gazetted on April 25 —showed that the intermediate course exams will be held on May 3, 5 & 9 (Group I) and May 11, 15 and 17 (Group II). The final exams are scheduled for May 2, 4 and 8 (Group ...
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has found gross negligence by edtech firm Byju's auditors, ICAI president Ranjeet Kumar Agarwal said on Wednesday. "Our inspection has found gross negligence on accounting practices by individual auditors of Byju's and accordingly we have recommended to the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB) to take punitive actions on auditors concerned," Agarwal told news agency PTI. Agarwal said, "The FRRB wil...
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided premises linked to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary Bibhav Kumar, and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP, Past President of ICAI Sh.ND Gupta in connection with a money laundering probe related to the Jal Board case. The central probe agency had last month arrested Jagdish Kumar Arora, the former chief engineer of the Delhi Jal Board. The probe agency claims that Arora awarded a contract worth Rs 38 crore to NKG Infrastru...
A bench of justice Bharav D Karia had observed that the activity of a CA includes that of accounting, auditing, refereeing, receivers, arbitrators and special commissioners as prescribed by the ICAI to be carried out on-premises and at places of managing partner may determine The Gujarat high court has ruled that a Chartered Accountancy (CA) firm should be classified as a professional establishment rather than a shop, commercial or retail entity and as a result, its employees are deemed ineli...
Notice Sent to Kumar Vishwas by Advocate (CA) Dr. Suneel Maggo for his Derogatory Remarks against Professionals (Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries). We had discussed the matter with Advocate Suneel Maggo and the same has been uploaded on the youtube but on the pressure of Kumar Vishwas, Video has been removed 2 times. In his notice to Kumar Vishwas, He asked for Sorry to the Professional else Next Defemation Notice to Kumar Vishwas for his Derogatory Remarks against Chartered A...


Comments