Why ICAI require a Council or Committees to run the Show?
Since last couple of years this question has been become a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) of each episode like what happened in last week in the wake of CBDT and Ministry of Finance virtually ignored and rejected the ICAI positions and written requests, representations made by the ICAI as a representing body of Chartered Accountants fraternity.
Since last two to three years issues like Bank audits, auditing scams, New Companies Laws provisions effecting auditors positions and risk etc have really leave the ICAI members in a corner where most of members are having a opinion that who is representing them and how he is being represented. Definitely, there is loss of credibility of ICAI and its elected council members in front of its members, various regulators, Government, CBDT, RBI and other bodies.
In current episode, all concerned in ICAI were assured and taken it granted till last week of September 2013 that CBDT will extend the due date. This was repetitive communicated directly or indirectly in various seminars held in August and September. It was only after a confusing Notification/ press release by the CBDT on 26th September 2013 that, The ICAI and its elected members started damage control type of exercise by sending letters requesting CBDT and Ministry of Finance to extend the tax audit due date. There is nothing to show that anybody at helm of the affair of the ICAI try to have meeting with Ministry of finance, CBDT, various industry chambers to represent the case strongly. Surprisingly there was no media release or protest from ICAI on this issue.
It is matter of high concerns that there was no official communication from the Direct Tax Committee of the ICAI to the members, industry and tax regulators. May be it is the inefficiency in the ICAI system that the person who should head the Direct tax committee, is heading the Indirect tax committee and the person who is heading the indirect tax committee, should be heading the direct tax committee.
Now it is high time for individual members and group of members to first send strong representations to ICAI and its council members to amend its way and have a policy to talk tough and act tough for any such future event. There is no meaning of praising a Company Bill which is prima facie against the interest of CAs and ICAI, same way there is no meaning in not going in public against the insensitivity on the part of CBDT and Ministry of Finance. It is a simple and important fact that, by not extending the due date, CBDT has open the Penalty Gateway for non filling of tax audit report on business community. It is the Business community who run the show of this country by way of its contributions by way of taxes and employments. The only thing ICAI can do it to file a RTI with CBDT for the reasons of any actions taken or not taken on its representations and representations made by the other professionals’ bodies, NGOs and business chambers.
Individual members and group of members, various NGOs made by members should file Such RTI s with CBDT asking them details of various representation, number of time Updation of utilities and dates of such Updation, details of effects of such Updation in utilities, number of tax audit report filled date wise in September, details of consideration of various public representations and reasons why these representations are not considered in public interests, and most importantly what is public interests in its notification dated 26th September 2013 not extending due dates of tax audit report.
Category : ICAI | Comments : 13 | Hits : 2624
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments
ANIL YADAV
01-Oct-2013 , 03:55:30 pmVery True.....all council members are only interest for their own interest.
ANOOP
01-Oct-2013 , 04:07:01 pmICAI is deteriorating the dignity of this profession, if it is so going on then future of new comer CA's is in dark & one day will come when no body wil recognise CA's..................... institute have to do something to save this profession.
Ravish
01-Oct-2013 , 04:22:19 pmVery True ......
S L Chaplot
01-Oct-2013 , 05:40:29 pmIts a known fact that the representations are not given true weightage. One more issue for TDS e-filling. The business community on behalf of the Govt collects the tax at source maintain the account and for the submission of return is forced to pay fee. You work for Govt and pay fees also for the same.
Manish Jopat
01-Oct-2013 , 05:43:30 pmICAI Should also consider to vacate its nomination to various committees of Ministry of Finance, Direct Tax. There is no point in representing in such places where our views on even administrative matters are not considered. Further, option of legal course should be examined and intervention of Courts should be requested for retrospective extension of due dates.
Manish Jopat
01-Oct-2013 , 05:55:06 pmThe Govt. is acting at its will. The Law prescribes that return for previous year should be filed in the next year by the prescribed date. Now govt has started to amend the return forms as per its will and as many times during the year.I think the assessee has the right to be informed of the forms required to be filed at the end of the year before the year starts. The assessee should have the opt
Sunil Arora
01-Oct-2013 , 07:07:59 pmIt is a big failure for our people at the helm of the apex body.
Om Prakash Bhadada
01-Oct-2013 , 07:56:09 pmI appreciate the concerns expressed by the moderator and other readers about the dubious role played by councils and various committees of ICAI on various counts and rough treatment meted out by CBDT / MoF etc. However, I would like to add a word of caution, we CA fraternity should not be allowed to be treated as slaves by our clients, that client shall provide required info and adequate time to f
CASANSAAR
01-Oct-2013 , 08:23:50 pmI appreciate the concerns expressed by the moderator and other readers about the dubious role played by councils and various committees of ICAI on various counts and rough treatment meted out by CBDT / MoF etc. However, I would like to add a word of caution, we CA fraternity should not be allowed to be treated as slaves by our clients, that client shall provide required info and adequate time to f
Pawan Kumar Sharma
02-Oct-2013 , 12:19:59 pmStop blaming CBDT or Finance Ministry for not extending time u/s. 139(1) in respect of tax audit cases. Six months time is more than enough to prepare/file return. I don not subscribe to the concern expressed by the Moderator/other readers and request not to accuse Council and its members for such issues.
Prashant Banthia
02-Oct-2013 , 05:32:47 pmI AGREE THAT COUNCIL OR SO CALLED COMMITTEE IS FAILING IN MANAGING THE AFFAIRS , EVERY BODY IS BUSY IN SELF INTEREST, THERE IS NO UNITY AMONG US WHICH GOVT AND OTHERS ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE.
Neeta Dharamshi
03-Oct-2013 , 12:56:50 pmI fully agree with you that why ICAI require council our committees to run the show when they can't even get done even smaller thing like getting date extended for return filing when there is genuine problem. We all where hoping that ICAI will get date extended and you failed in our this smaller expectations and many others issues too
ANAND KUMAR GUPTA
31-Oct-2013 , 03:56:53 pmdon't talk about council or committees. Our central council members sign the minutes of meeting of committee without knowing that what matter has been discussed in that meeting. Even they don't remember about their presence in the meeting. This has happened in March in a meeting in which fees of ISA revisionery class has been increased from Rs. 2500 to Rs. 17500. The members present in the meeti