Bombay HC rules in favour of Vodafone in Rs 8500 crore transfer pricing case
The Bombay High Court on Thursday ruled in favour of the Indian arm of Vodafone Group Plc in tax dispute over a Rs 8,500 crore transaction involving a local subsidiary in 2007-08.
The ruling is likely to soothe nerves of foreign investors who are caught in similar “transfer pricing” disputes and help counter the perception that India was a difficult place to do business.
The case involves sale of Vodafone’s call centre business to Hutchison in 2007, and is different from a bigger Rs, 12,000 crore tax case involving the British telecom giant’s purchase Hutchison Whampoa’s telecom assets in India.
The Bombay High Court overruled an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of last year, which had suggested that the I-T department had jurisdiction over this issue.
The income tax department had placed an Rs 3700 crore demand on the telecom company charging its local arm—Vodafone India Services Pvt Ltd-- with under-pricing share sales of its call centre business to Hutchison and assigning call options to its parent Vodafone International BV in 2007-08.
Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd challenged the tax department’s jurisdiction in issuing the “transfer pricing” order that added Rs 8,500 crore to the company’s taxable income for 2007-2008.
It moved the Bombay High Court in February 2012 maintaining that the transaction is not an international transaction and, therefore, should not attract tax.
Transfer pricing is the value at which companies trade products, services or assets among various arms in different countries.
According to tax avoidance rules, these transactions need be carried out on an “arm’s length” basis—in a manner that it involves an unrelated company.
On Thursday the Bombay High Court ruled in favour of the British telecom giant.
“Vodafone welcome’s today’s decision by the Bombay High Court,” the company said in a statement.
Vodafone’s repeated run-ins with taxmen had stoked fears about the country’s high-handedness in dealing with foreign investors.
In 2012, India changed laws to impose taxes on older corporate deals such as British telecom giant Vodafone’s acquisition of Hutchison Whampoa’s telecom assets in India.
While the government has said India will not bring on fresh cases of retrospective taxes, there is still some anxiety among multi-national corporations about it.
The company is now engaged in an international arbitration on the case with India under a bilateral investment treaty. (Hindustan Times)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 412
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments