News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
CBDT eased prosecution norms for TDS, I-T return filing defaults
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has relaxed some norms relating to prosecution of income tax defaulters for delay in depositing TDS (tax deducted at source), under-reporting of income in the tax return or non-filing of I-T return.
CBDT’s circular, issued on September 9, sets the limit and time period for proceeding with prosecution in respect of TDS defaults. It states: Cases where non-payment of TDS is Rs 25 lakh or below and delay in deposit is less than 60 days from the due date shall not be processed for prosecution in normal circumstances. However, irrespective of this, recourse will continue to lie against habitual defaulters, with the approval of a “collegium” comprising of two senior-ranking officers.
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had tweeted last month: “I have instructed the revenue secretary to come up with measures to ensure that honest taxpayers are not harassed and those who commit minor or procedural violations are not subjected to disproportionate or excessive action.”
It may be recalled that Bollywood producer Firoz Nadiadwala had hit the headlines in May when Mumbai’s magistrate court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of three months for delay in depositing TDS of Rs 8.56 lakh. This was because Section 276B provides for prosecution for a period between three months and seven years, irrespective of the period of delay or the quantum of TDS not deposited in time. Across India, several such sentences have been issued by magistrate courts.
CBDT has also relaxed prosecution norms for offences relating to under-reporting (concealing one’s income) in the I-T return. Where the amount sought to be evaded or the tax on the under-reported income is Rs 25 lakh or below, a safety net has been built in. In such instances the case shall not be taken up for prosecution only after approval of the collegium. For such offences, the imprisonment term can be up to seven years.
In cases of non-filing of I-T return, if the amount of tax which would have been evaded by not filing is Rs 25 lakh or less, approval of the collegium is required for initiating the prosecution process. The I-T Act had provided a low threshold of Rs 10,000 for launching prosecution for non-filing of I-T returns. Non-filing can result in rigorous imprisonment of up to seven years.
This circular will come into effect immediately and shall apply to all pending cases where the prosecution complaint is yet to be filed by the tax authorities. Tarun Kumar Singhal, a Mumbai-based chartered accountant, says, “Ideally, prosecution process already launched but not in accordance with this new circular also needs to be dropped suo motu.” #casansaar (Source - Times of India)
CBDT’s circular, issued on September 9, sets the limit and time period for proceeding with prosecution in respect of TDS defaults. It states: Cases where non-payment of TDS is Rs 25 lakh or below and delay in deposit is less than 60 days from the due date shall not be processed for prosecution in normal circumstances. However, irrespective of this, recourse will continue to lie against habitual defaulters, with the approval of a “collegium” comprising of two senior-ranking officers.
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had tweeted last month: “I have instructed the revenue secretary to come up with measures to ensure that honest taxpayers are not harassed and those who commit minor or procedural violations are not subjected to disproportionate or excessive action.”
It may be recalled that Bollywood producer Firoz Nadiadwala had hit the headlines in May when Mumbai’s magistrate court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of three months for delay in depositing TDS of Rs 8.56 lakh. This was because Section 276B provides for prosecution for a period between three months and seven years, irrespective of the period of delay or the quantum of TDS not deposited in time. Across India, several such sentences have been issued by magistrate courts.
CBDT has also relaxed prosecution norms for offences relating to under-reporting (concealing one’s income) in the I-T return. Where the amount sought to be evaded or the tax on the under-reported income is Rs 25 lakh or below, a safety net has been built in. In such instances the case shall not be taken up for prosecution only after approval of the collegium. For such offences, the imprisonment term can be up to seven years.
In cases of non-filing of I-T return, if the amount of tax which would have been evaded by not filing is Rs 25 lakh or less, approval of the collegium is required for initiating the prosecution process. The I-T Act had provided a low threshold of Rs 10,000 for launching prosecution for non-filing of I-T returns. Non-filing can result in rigorous imprisonment of up to seven years.
This circular will come into effect immediately and shall apply to all pending cases where the prosecution complaint is yet to be filed by the tax authorities. Tarun Kumar Singhal, a Mumbai-based chartered accountant, says, “Ideally, prosecution process already launched but not in accordance with this new circular also needs to be dropped suo motu.” #casansaar (Source - Times of India)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 891
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments