News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
CBDT puts on hold circular on taxation of indirect transfer of shares
In a bid to soothe the nerves of foreign portfolio investors spooked by a fresh tax burden on indirect transfers mooted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes last month, the finance ministry stepped into the picture on Tuesday and put the tax department missive in abeyance till further notice.
The tax department circular issued on December 21 clarified that all foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) with more than 50% of their assets in India and owning over 5% stake in any listed entities would incur tax under India’s indirect transfer provisions. This tax would be levied in addition to the securities transaction tax and short-term capital gains tax and would hurt India-dedicated global investment vehicles more than, say an emerging markets fund that has less than 50% exposure to the Indian market.
“After the issue of the aforementioned circular, representations have been received from various FPIs, FIIs, venture capital funds and other stakeholders,” the finance ministry said in a statement late Tuesday, seeking to calm investor anxiety ahead of the Union Budget.
“The stakeholders have presented their concerns stating that the circular does not address the issue of possible multiple taxation of the same income. The representations made by the stakeholders are currently under consideration and examination. Pending a decision in the matter, the operation of the above mentioned circular is kept in abeyance for the time being,” the ministry said
“This was very much the need of the hour,” Tejas Desai, Partner, Tax & Regulatory Services at EY India said. “The interpretation of the law canvassed by the circular was giving rise to unreasonable and unacceptable outcomes for foreign funds and international investors.”
The Central Board of Direct Taxes circular had revived the bad memories and had created widespread concern amongst the FPI community, said Suresh Swamy, partner - financial services tax at PwC, stressing it had created ‘an unnecessary scare.’ “Hopefully, an appropriate amendment to Section 9(1)(i) in the upcoming budget will put the whole issue of offshore transfer to rest for investors investing in an FPI,” he said.
Mr Desai also said that the government’s decision to put this in abeyance is only a temporary measure.
“The issue doesn’t end here though,” he said. “The Government has only said that they are putting the Circular in abeyance, pending a decision in the matter. The Budget should appropriately clarify the legislative intent of the indirect transfer tax provisions to bring finality to this simmering issue.” #casansaar (The Hindu)
The tax department circular issued on December 21 clarified that all foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) with more than 50% of their assets in India and owning over 5% stake in any listed entities would incur tax under India’s indirect transfer provisions. This tax would be levied in addition to the securities transaction tax and short-term capital gains tax and would hurt India-dedicated global investment vehicles more than, say an emerging markets fund that has less than 50% exposure to the Indian market.
“After the issue of the aforementioned circular, representations have been received from various FPIs, FIIs, venture capital funds and other stakeholders,” the finance ministry said in a statement late Tuesday, seeking to calm investor anxiety ahead of the Union Budget.
“The stakeholders have presented their concerns stating that the circular does not address the issue of possible multiple taxation of the same income. The representations made by the stakeholders are currently under consideration and examination. Pending a decision in the matter, the operation of the above mentioned circular is kept in abeyance for the time being,” the ministry said
“This was very much the need of the hour,” Tejas Desai, Partner, Tax & Regulatory Services at EY India said. “The interpretation of the law canvassed by the circular was giving rise to unreasonable and unacceptable outcomes for foreign funds and international investors.”
The Central Board of Direct Taxes circular had revived the bad memories and had created widespread concern amongst the FPI community, said Suresh Swamy, partner - financial services tax at PwC, stressing it had created ‘an unnecessary scare.’ “Hopefully, an appropriate amendment to Section 9(1)(i) in the upcoming budget will put the whole issue of offshore transfer to rest for investors investing in an FPI,” he said.
Mr Desai also said that the government’s decision to put this in abeyance is only a temporary measure.
“The issue doesn’t end here though,” he said. “The Government has only said that they are putting the Circular in abeyance, pending a decision in the matter. The Budget should appropriately clarify the legislative intent of the indirect transfer tax provisions to bring finality to this simmering issue.” #casansaar (The Hindu)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 394
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments