News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Delhi HC recalls CBI probe order after Income Tax department says email was sent due to systems error
The Delhi High Court has recalled an order directing CBI to probe whether an email that was sent to a private company by the Income tax department was genuine or not, after the authorities submitted that the communication was “triggered due to a systems error” and withdrew its allegation of perjury against the petitioner company.
“The unconditional apology offered by the respondent is accepted by this court and the allegations against the petitioner that he had had prima facie committed penal offences under Section 191, 192 and 196 of the IPC are deleted. Consequently, the order dated 16th July, 2021 directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to enquire as to whether the email dated 31st May, 2021 had been issued to the petitioner by the Tax Department is recalled,” the Division Bench of Justices Manmohan and Navin Chawla said in the judgment.
The controversy revolves around an email received by the company from “donotreply@incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in” on May 31 informing it that it has been granted adjournment and time till June 14 to file reply to the notice issued under Section 142 (1) — inquiry before assessment — of the Income Tax Act. However, despite the communication, the company received an assessment order on June 2. The order was challenged before the High Court by the company on the ground that it had been granted more time and there was no occasion for the authorities to pass the order after the grant of adjournment.
However, the officials of the assistant commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 6 claimed that the email was not sent by them and all the communications to the company by it had originated from the email id delhi.dcit.cen6@incometax.gov.in. The department had alleged that the company had committed offences under Sections 191, 192 and 196 of the Indian Penal Code since the email produced before the court did not originate from the official email id.
Observing that the allegation pertains to a sensitive server belonging to the Union Ministry of Finance and Department of Income Tax and involves a senior official holding a sensitive post, the court, on July 17, had directed the CBI to probe and file a report within four weeks. However, the Income Tax department on July 26 filed an application seeking modification of the order.
During the hearing last week, additional solicitor general N Venkataraman admitted that the email received by the company is a genuine email from the department. Claiming that the communication was triggered due to a systems error, Venkataraman sought withdrawal of the allegation that the petitioner had committed offences. The Income Tax department officer who made the allegation also expressed his regrets and gave an undertaking to be more careful in the future.
With the department conceding that the assessment order and notice of demand were passed in violation of the principle of natural justice, the Division Bench quashed them and asked the authorities to pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner company.
“The unconditional apology offered by the respondent is accepted by this court and the allegations against the petitioner that he had had prima facie committed penal offences under Section 191, 192 and 196 of the IPC are deleted. Consequently, the order dated 16th July, 2021 directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to enquire as to whether the email dated 31st May, 2021 had been issued to the petitioner by the Tax Department is recalled,” the Division Bench of Justices Manmohan and Navin Chawla said in the judgment.
The controversy revolves around an email received by the company from “donotreply@incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in” on May 31 informing it that it has been granted adjournment and time till June 14 to file reply to the notice issued under Section 142 (1) — inquiry before assessment — of the Income Tax Act. However, despite the communication, the company received an assessment order on June 2. The order was challenged before the High Court by the company on the ground that it had been granted more time and there was no occasion for the authorities to pass the order after the grant of adjournment.
However, the officials of the assistant commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 6 claimed that the email was not sent by them and all the communications to the company by it had originated from the email id delhi.dcit.cen6@incometax.gov.in. The department had alleged that the company had committed offences under Sections 191, 192 and 196 of the Indian Penal Code since the email produced before the court did not originate from the official email id.
Observing that the allegation pertains to a sensitive server belonging to the Union Ministry of Finance and Department of Income Tax and involves a senior official holding a sensitive post, the court, on July 17, had directed the CBI to probe and file a report within four weeks. However, the Income Tax department on July 26 filed an application seeking modification of the order.
During the hearing last week, additional solicitor general N Venkataraman admitted that the email received by the company is a genuine email from the department. Claiming that the communication was triggered due to a systems error, Venkataraman sought withdrawal of the allegation that the petitioner had committed offences. The Income Tax department officer who made the allegation also expressed his regrets and gave an undertaking to be more careful in the future.
With the department conceding that the assessment order and notice of demand were passed in violation of the principle of natural justice, the Division Bench quashed them and asked the authorities to pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner company.
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 11921
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments