News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Firms were made to deposit service tax under COERCION - HC
In a strong order against central excise authority, Delhi High Court asked it to refund the service tax amount paid by three travel portals soon, observing that these firms were made to deposit the money under "coercion and duress" through the "unwarranted" arrest of some of their senior officials.
The direction was given by a bench of justices S Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru which made it clear that if the amount was not refunded to Makemytrip, Ibibo and Ebiz within four weeks, then it would make Director General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) liable to pay simple interest at six per cent per annum on it.
In a stern order, the court also directed DGCEI to pay the costs of Rs one lakh to each of the three companies within four weeks.
"The court is unable to accept that payment by the petitioners of alleged service tax arrears was voluntary. The payment of Rs 17 crores by eBIZ was not voluntary but under coercion and duress.
"Consequently, the amount that was paid by petitioners as a result of the search of their premises by the DGCEI, without an adjudication, much less a show cause notice, is required to be returned to them forthwith," the bench said.
It also said that in the case of Makemytrip (MMT) and Ebiz, "the resort to the extreme coercive measure of arrest followed by the detention" of M K Pallai, Vice President (Finance) of MMT and Pawan Malhan, Managing Director of eBiz, "was impermissible in law" and "totally unwarranted".
It told DGCEI that it has to use the power of arrest "with great circumspection and not casually" to induce fear into an assessee, as was done in these cases.
The court held that "DGCEI fails to make out even a prima facie case that some portion of the service tax collected by petitioners (three portals) from the customers as representing service tax or otherwise has been retained by them. Without such prima facie conclusion, it cannot be inferred that the petitioners have violated the Finance Act".
DGCEI had taken action against, Ibibo and Ebiz on the
ground that they collected service tax from customers for hotel and travel bookings but did not deposit it with the government.
The bench, in its verdicts delivered on the pleas of the three companies, said that in these cases, these firms were regularly filing service tax returns and in such a situation another agency like DGCEI "cannot, without a show cause notice or enquiry, straightway go ahead to make an arrest merely on the suspicion of evasion of service tax or failure to deposit service tax that has been collected".
The court said an enquiry ought to be conducted and the person to be arrested should be given a hearing, prior to taking any coercive action and the only exception to this was when the individual was a "habitual evader of service tax".
"There is no such determination in any of these cases," it said and added "the decision to arrest a person must not be taken on whimsical grounds, it must be based on credible material."
The court also held that the search carried out at the premises of the three companies was "unconstitutional and legally unsustainable".
The judgement came on the pleas of the three companies challenging the action taken against them by DGCEI which had accused them of evading service tax to the tune of several crore rupees.
Makemytrip and Ibibo had in their pleas also questioned the powers of DGCEI of arrest, investigation and assessment of service tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. #casansaar (PTI - Business Standard)
The direction was given by a bench of justices S Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru which made it clear that if the amount was not refunded to Makemytrip, Ibibo and Ebiz within four weeks, then it would make Director General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) liable to pay simple interest at six per cent per annum on it.
In a stern order, the court also directed DGCEI to pay the costs of Rs one lakh to each of the three companies within four weeks.
"The court is unable to accept that payment by the petitioners of alleged service tax arrears was voluntary. The payment of Rs 17 crores by eBIZ was not voluntary but under coercion and duress.
"Consequently, the amount that was paid by petitioners as a result of the search of their premises by the DGCEI, without an adjudication, much less a show cause notice, is required to be returned to them forthwith," the bench said.
It also said that in the case of Makemytrip (MMT) and Ebiz, "the resort to the extreme coercive measure of arrest followed by the detention" of M K Pallai, Vice President (Finance) of MMT and Pawan Malhan, Managing Director of eBiz, "was impermissible in law" and "totally unwarranted".
It told DGCEI that it has to use the power of arrest "with great circumspection and not casually" to induce fear into an assessee, as was done in these cases.
The court held that "DGCEI fails to make out even a prima facie case that some portion of the service tax collected by petitioners (three portals) from the customers as representing service tax or otherwise has been retained by them. Without such prima facie conclusion, it cannot be inferred that the petitioners have violated the Finance Act".
DGCEI had taken action against, Ibibo and Ebiz on the
ground that they collected service tax from customers for hotel and travel bookings but did not deposit it with the government.
The bench, in its verdicts delivered on the pleas of the three companies, said that in these cases, these firms were regularly filing service tax returns and in such a situation another agency like DGCEI "cannot, without a show cause notice or enquiry, straightway go ahead to make an arrest merely on the suspicion of evasion of service tax or failure to deposit service tax that has been collected".
The court said an enquiry ought to be conducted and the person to be arrested should be given a hearing, prior to taking any coercive action and the only exception to this was when the individual was a "habitual evader of service tax".
"There is no such determination in any of these cases," it said and added "the decision to arrest a person must not be taken on whimsical grounds, it must be based on credible material."
The court also held that the search carried out at the premises of the three companies was "unconstitutional and legally unsustainable".
The judgement came on the pleas of the three companies challenging the action taken against them by DGCEI which had accused them of evading service tax to the tune of several crore rupees.
Makemytrip and Ibibo had in their pleas also questioned the powers of DGCEI of arrest, investigation and assessment of service tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. #casansaar (PTI - Business Standard)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 676
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments