Firms were made to deposit service tax under COERCION - HC
Listen to this Article
The direction was given by a bench of justices S Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru which made it clear that if the amount was not refunded to Makemytrip, Ibibo and Ebiz within four weeks, then it would make Director General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) liable to pay simple interest at six per cent per annum on it.
In a stern order, the court also directed DGCEI to pay the costs of Rs one lakh to each of the three companies within four weeks.
"The court is unable to accept that payment by the petitioners of alleged service tax arrears was voluntary. The payment of Rs 17 crores by eBIZ was not voluntary but under coercion and duress.
"Consequently, the amount that was paid by petitioners as a result of the search of their premises by the DGCEI, without an adjudication, much less a show cause notice, is required to be returned to them forthwith," the bench said.
It also said that in the case of Makemytrip (MMT) and Ebiz, "the resort to the extreme coercive measure of arrest followed by the detention" of M K Pallai, Vice President (Finance) of MMT and Pawan Malhan, Managing Director of eBiz, "was impermissible in law" and "totally unwarranted".
It told DGCEI that it has to use the power of arrest "with great circumspection and not casually" to induce fear into an assessee, as was done in these cases.
The court held that "DGCEI fails to make out even a prima facie case that some portion of the service tax collected by petitioners (three portals) from the customers as representing service tax or otherwise has been retained by them. Without such prima facie conclusion, it cannot be inferred that the petitioners have violated the Finance Act".
DGCEI had taken action against, Ibibo and Ebiz on the
ground that they collected service tax from customers for hotel and travel bookings but did not deposit it with the government.
The bench, in its verdicts delivered on the pleas of the three companies, said that in these cases, these firms were regularly filing service tax returns and in such a situation another agency like DGCEI "cannot, without a show cause notice or enquiry, straightway go ahead to make an arrest merely on the suspicion of evasion of service tax or failure to deposit service tax that has been collected".
The court said an enquiry ought to be conducted and the person to be arrested should be given a hearing, prior to taking any coercive action and the only exception to this was when the individual was a "habitual evader of service tax".
"There is no such determination in any of these cases," it said and added "the decision to arrest a person must not be taken on whimsical grounds, it must be based on credible material."
The court also held that the search carried out at the premises of the three companies was "unconstitutional and legally unsustainable".
The judgement came on the pleas of the three companies challenging the action taken against them by DGCEI which had accused them of evading service tax to the tune of several crore rupees.
Makemytrip and Ibibo had in their pleas also questioned the powers of DGCEI of arrest, investigation and assessment of service tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. #casansaar (PTI - Business Standard)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 683
If you earn income other than salary or have multiple income streams, the advance tax deadline falling today—Monday, December 15, 2025—should not be overlooked. Failure to pay advance tax on time, or paying less than the required amount, may attract interest charges that continue to accumulate. As the Income Tax Act operates on a “pay as you earn” basis, being aware of advance tax provisions and the financial impact of delays can help you avoid unnecessary costs and last-...
If you earn income other than salary or have multiple income streams, the advance tax deadline falling today—Monday, December 15, 2025—should not be overlooked. Failure to pay advance tax on time, or paying less than the required amount, may attract interest charges that continue to accumulate. As the Income Tax Act operates on a “pay as you earn” basis, being aware of advance tax provisions and the financial impact of delays can help you avoid unnecessary costs and last-...
As many as 5,44,205 appeals were pending resolution with the Income Tax (IT) Department at commissioner (appeals) level as of January 31 this year, and 63,246 at various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITATs), High Courts, and the Supreme Court, FE has learnt. To be precise, the cases pending in ITATs were 20,266 High Courts, 37,436; and Supreme Court 5,544. The large pendency is even as the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has laid emphasis on disposing of income tax appeals in its 10...
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has facilitated taxpayers to file their Income Tax Returns (ITRs) for the Assessment Year 2024-25 (relevant to Financial Year 2023-24) from 1st April, 2024 onwards. The ITR functionalities i.e. ITR-1, ITR-2 and ITR-4, commonly used by taxpayers are available on the e-filing portal from 1st April, 2024 onwards for taxpayers to file their Returns. Companies will also be able to file their ITRs through ITR-6 from April 1 onwards. As ...
It has come to notice that misleading information related to new tax regime is being spread on some social media platforms. It is therefore clarified that the new regime under section 115BAC(1A) was introduced in the Finance Act 2023 which was as under as compared to the existing old regime (without exemptions): New Regime 115BAC (1A) introduced for FY 2023-24 Existing old Regime 0-3 lacs 0% 0-2.5 lacs 0% ...


Comments