Tax relief denial does not affect exempt income: Tribunal
Jamsetji Tata Trust has won a major reprieve from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which has held that exempt income — such as dividend and long-term capital gains — cannot be brought to tax in the hands of the trust even if the investments made by it do not meet the criteria prescribed under the Income Tax (I-T) Act.
As per the ITAT's recent order, income of Rs 444 crore (or nearly 62% of its total income), which comprises such exempt income, will not be taxable in the hands of the trust. The tax authorities had denied the tax exemption status available to the trust under section 11 of the I-T Act. Consequently, they sought to treat the entire income of the trust as taxable.
Jamsetji Tata Trust had invested Rs 545 crore in cumulative redeemable preference shares of Tata Sons during financial year (FY) 2009-10 and as such investment was held as 'ineligible' by the tax authorities, who had sought to tax the entire income of Rs 715 crore in the hands of the trust. Such investments in Tata Sons were made from sale proceeds of one crore TCS shares. The tax authorities also held the original investment in TCS to be an ineligible investment. Jamsetji Tata Trust then filed an appeal before the ITAT.
Under the I-T laws, a trust claiming tax exemption is required to use at least 85% of its funds in a given financial year. A leeway is given and, in addition, an extra 15% of the funds (even if not used) is not taxable. Any excess shortfall in utilization is also not subject to tax provided such unutilized amount is accumulated for a period not exceeding five years and a reason for such accumulation is provided to the tax officer. This money, which is being accumulated, is to be invested in eligible investments, as prescribed under section 13 of the I-T Act.
Restrictions for investment in shares apply to a trust which seeks tax exempt status. If a trust wishes to be tax exempt, shares can be held by it only if these shares form part of the corpus of the trust as on June 1, 1973. However, investments in PSU shares is permitted.
The tax authorities pointed out that Jamsetji Tata Trust had not met the fund utilization norms. Of the total income of Rs 715 crore, the trust applied only Rs 165 crore (appx) for meeting the objective of the trust during FY 2009-10. A large portion of the balance was invested in shares of Tata Sons. Proceeds on sale of one crore TCS shares had been reinvested in preference shares of Tata Sons. Even the original TCS shares held by it were not eligible under section 13 norms as they did not form part of the trust's corpus as on June 1, 1973 but were received as a corpus donation during June 2001. In subsequent years, the trust also got the benefit of bonus shares that were allotted by TCS.
In its order, which is largely favourable to the trust, the ITAT has held that for violation of the provisions of section 13 (investment norms), only such portion of the income which is derived from the ineligible investments can be denied tax exemption and not the entire income of the trust. More importantly, the ITAT held that dividend income on shares and mutual funds and long-term capital gains on shares are exempt under the provisions of section 10 and cannot be brought to tax by applying section 11 and 13 of the I-T Act.
TOI had on November 21, 2013 reported that the CAG, in its audit report, has commented on ineligible investments made Jamsetji Tata Trust and another Tata trust. A Tata trustee had responded that they were not aware of the CAG comments, but the matter was under appeal.
Times of India.
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 452
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments