Taxman calls on Microsoft India for understating income
After Nokia and Royal Dutch Shell, the Income Tax (I-T) department has sent a demand notice to software giant Microsoft’s Indian arm, which said it has challenged the same.
I-T department reportedly sent notice to Microsoft seeking details of its income from Indian operations for four years beginning with the 2005-06 fiscal.
Details have been sought about income from work done at Microsoft’s Indian research and development sites on several softwares, which were marketed globally.
When reached for comments, Microsoft India said it has approached appellate forums for the resolution of the issue.
“Microsoft complies with the tax laws in each jurisdiction in which we operate. We are seeking relief against the transfer pricing (TP) adjustments through the appropriate appellate forums,” it said in an e-mail statement.
The I-T department notice reportedly does not quantify the amount of profits earned by its US-based parent Microsoft Corporation that are attributable to the work performed at its R&D centres in India.
The company said: “Since the matter is sub judice, we are unable to provide further details or comments regarding the same. We are hopeful that the Rangachary Committee recommendations on R&D Centers and Safe Harbours will help facilitate resolutions to TP litigations in the IT industry.”
Last year, the government had set up a panel, headed by former Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) chairman N. Rangachary, to address issues like approach to taxation of development centres, tax treatment of ‘onsite services’ of domestic software firms and those related to finalizing safe harbour provisions.
Safe harbour principles are international disclosure practices to check litigations in transfer pricing—an accounting mechanism undertaken by MNCs to reduce their tax liabilities.
In March this year, the Indian subsidiary of the Finnish mobile phone maker Nokia was served the I-T notice asking it to pay over Rs.2,000 crore for alleged evasion of taxes in its business transactions in the country.
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 279
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments