Whether only Extension u/s 139(1) will end all the TAR/ITRs related problems year after year
Respected Members,
Last month, the CBDT gave us extension of TAR date to hide their unplanned & incompetent decision of mid-year TAR revamp as well as for their inability to provide its schema for almost a month, just to make us fool, when the deferment was well justified.
And why..., because they say your apex body demanded either this or that, and we fulfilled their (yours) wish.
The men at CBDT diplomatically converted our mindset to extension of TAR vs. ITR due date and successfully diverted our focus from root of all the evil by single master stroke.
But when the CBDT can't provide all the necessary formats & schema of TAR & ITR on 1st April or change it in between, why they would compel the Taxpayers and Professionals for making compliance within the due dates prescribed under the Act.
Sir, I am not well versed with the complications of the law, but it is my understanding that the CBDT may not have powers to deprive taxpayers and auditors from the privileges granted by legislature in shape of effective time period of 180 days for Tax Audit to plan, prepare, execute and file TAR and ITR.
To me, filing of TAR or ITR requires significant time in planning, preparing, executing etc. before making its actually filing. All such action components are vital part & parcel of filing of TAR or ITR and necessarily forms the whole of returns' filing process. No one should ever distinguish or separate these time taking acts from returns' filing, which are pre-requisite to filing of TAR & relevant ITR.
As such, the CAs and Taxpayers are both equally harassed by the irrational decisions of CBDT in name of amending the Rules. But the Rules are there to support the Act and can Never override the Act, as I think.
Seniors and Respected members are kindly requested to take care of these issues in pleading with Hon'ble HC's, who have very learned Jury and not the deaf & dumbs in bureaucracy.
If we fail to urge and impress the Lords of Justice this time, we should be ready to face the worst by tyrant CBDT in future.
And to me, getting mere extension u/s 139(1) will not be real victory to rejoice or celebrate, but to ponder that who will compensate us for our precious time to be wasted after 30 Sept, which we have well planned to finish by 30 Sept. prior to the revision of TAR.
And Sir, we can't expect it from bureaucrats, who think that our time is not as precious as theirs.
(CA. Dilip Khetan, Gorakhpur)
Category : Income Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1204
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments