SC upholds homebuyers' rights as financial creditors under IBC
PrintListen to this Article
Dismissing the plea of over 200 real estate companies that had pleaded that the IBC amendment was illegal and unconstitutional, a bench headed by Justice RF Nariman said the amendment provided homebuyers with an additional platform on which they could raise their grievances against real estate developers.
The bench said that the RERA act, which regulates the real estate sector, should be read in harmony with the IBC amendments. RERA is not in derogation of any act, and in case of conflict between RERA and IBC, IBC prevails, the court made it clear.
The consumers have the option of seeking remedy under any provision — the Consumer Protection Act, IBC or RERA, it said.
The bench said only genuine homebuyers can invoke insolvency proceedings against a builder, and asked the Centre to file an affidavit taking corrective measures.
"It's a landmark judgment as the amendment has been upheld," said Ashwarya Sinha, advocate who had represented some of the homebuyers in the case. "Additionally, it will settle a lot of teething issues faced by forums, including NCLT/consumer forums/RERA, across the country. Further, as per the judgment some additional defences unique to IBC have also been added."
SC also directed the Centre to fill up vacancies in the National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal to handle the rising number of cases filed against companies under IBC.
The Court was hearing a batch of petitions filed by over 200 real estate companies challenging the constitutional validity of the IBC amendment that gives homebuyers the status of financial creditor in the insolvency proceedings.
The real estate companies challenged the validity of Section 5(8)(f) of the IBC which ensures inclusion of homebuyers as financial creditors and said the provision was draconian and unconstitutional. The builders had argued that homebuyers had remedies under the RERA, and the amendments to IBC amounts to duplication.
"The constitutional bench of the Supreme Court upholding the constitutional validity of the amendment in IBC to include homebuyers in the list of financial creditors is certainly a huge sigh of relief for aggrieved homebuyers," said advocate Aditya Parolia, PSP Legal, who represented homebuyers in the lead matter, Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure.
The landmark judgment will prove to be a huge deterrent against fraudulent/unscrupulous builders, he added.
Earlier, the Centre had filed an affidavit in the apex court and said the law was amended to protect the interest of lakhs of homebuyers who had invested their hard earned money to purchase flats, but were cheated by the companies.
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure had filed a plea in the Supreme Court in January 2019 challenging the constitutional validity of section 5 (8) (f) of the IBC 2016 under which homebuyers were conferred the right of financial creditors.
A host of similar writs were by filed by developers such as BPTP, Supertech, Today Homes Noida, Ireo, CHD Developers, ATS among others. #casansaar (Source - PTI, MoneyControl)
Category : Insolvent Professional | Comments : 0 | Hits : 346
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Monday ordered insolvency proceedings against media baron Subhash Chandra on a plea filed by Indiabulls Housing Finance. A two-member Delhi bench of the NCLT directed initiation of personal insolvency proceedings against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL) Chairman Emeritus Chandra, who was a guarantor for a loan given to Essel group firm Vivek Infracon Ltd. The NCLT bench, consisting members Ashok K Bhardwaj and Subrata K Das,...
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) invites suggestions/comments from public and regulated entities, on the Regulations for simplifying, easing and reducing cost of compliance. The suggestions are invited in pursuance of the announcement made in the Union Budget for FY 2023-24 by the Union Finance Minister: “To simplify, ease and reduce cost of compliance, financial sector regulators will be requested to carry out a comprehensive review of existing regulations. For th...
To make surety bond business more attractive, the government is looking at making relevant changes in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to consider insurers as financial creditor in case of default of infra projects. The surety bond issued by a general insurance company is a three-party contract by which one party (the surety) guarantees the performance or obligations of a second party (the principal) to a third party (the obligee). The surety is a company that provides the fina...
The National Company Law Tribunal Delhi recently observed that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used as a recovery tool. “We are of the view that in the present case the applicants are already having demands drafts of amount exceeding the defaulted amount in this petition and moreover IBC cannot be used as a tool for recovery; the settlement has been arrived between the parties. The amount has been paid in excess of the default amount and Ld. Counsel for the applicant has al...
India’s turbulent aviation sector will likely see another player go belly up with Go First of the Wadias filing for voluntary insolvency before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The budget carrier said it is cancelling all flights on May 3, 4, and 5 and will refund the full fares to the passengers. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has questioned the cancellation and issued a show-cause to the airline. Go First has been asked to submit its response within 24 ho...
Comments