News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
Loan re-negotiation does not free Company, Auditors from showing interest liability in financial statements - NFRA
PrintNFRA debarred an Ahmedabad-based auditor for one year and imposed a monetary penalty of Rs.100,000 in the case which involved audit of a clothing company after its investigation found alleged irregularities in the financial statements of FY16.
Ongoing negotiations with banks and non-bank lenders for restructuring loans does not absolve a company from the responsibility to recognise interest cost in financial statements and statutory auditors cannot wash their hands off their obligation to raise a redflag for such omission, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) said in an order issued late on Thursday.
Rejecting an auditor's plea that there was uncertainty about the payment of dues due to discussions with lenders, NFRA said that even if the company is incapable of paying back dues and management does not acknowledge it as payable, contractual obligations like interest payments are still to be recognised as liabilities by the company.
NFRA debarred an Ahmedabad-based auditor for one year and imposed a monetary penalty of ?100,000 in the case which involved audit of a clothing company after its investigation found alleged irregularities in the financial statements of FY16.
The company had not recognised accrued interest on loans from bank and non-banking finance companies in violation of sections of the Companies Act and the auditing standards, NFRA said. "With proper accounting of interest accrued, the reported loss of the company would have increased by about eight times," the regulator said.
Such a material and pervasive misstatement in the financial statement of the company was not reported by the audit engagement partner in his auditor's report, NFRA pointed out. The various instances of non-compliance with the format of financial statements have also been noted, which have not been reported by the engagement partner in the auditor's report, NFRA said.
NFRA imposed the penalty, alleging it has found the audit engagement partner guilty of professional misconduct.
The auditor informed the regulator that the management was in negotiations with the bank for a one-time settlement of the loan and hence, in his professional judgment, no additional interest expenses were payable to clear the dues of the bank. The partner also referred to a no-dues certificate from the bank issued in 2018 showing the loan was settled through a one-time settlement. The auditor claimed that the judgment exercised by him at the time of the audit to agree with the decision of the management not to recognise further interest was neither misplaced nor without a proper basis, the regulator's order showed.
NFRA held the auditor guilty of failure to disclose material facts known to him, which are not disclosed in a financial statement, but the disclosure of which was necessary in making such a financial statement.
The audit regulator pointed out that there was no evidence of a firm commitment from the bank on waiver of interest at the time of the audit of FY16 financial statements. The settlement with the bank came into effect only in 2018, that is, 19 months after the signing of the balance sheet by the auditor in 2016.
The audit engagement partner is using subsequent developments, that took place over one and a half years to justify his actions at the time of statutory audit, NFRA pointed out.
"The accrual concept in accounting requires a company to record revenue and expenses in the period they are earned or incurred, regardless of when the related cash transactions occur. Liabilities, including contractual obligations, are recognized in the financial statements when they are incurred, even if payment is not due until a later period. This means that contractual obligations that are incapable of being fulfilled are still recognized as liabilities by a company, even if they are not acknowledged any longer by the management," NFRA said in its order. (ends)
Ongoing negotiations with banks and non-bank lenders for restructuring loans does not absolve a company from the responsibility to recognise interest cost in financial statements and statutory auditors cannot wash their hands off their obligation to raise a redflag for such omission, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) said in an order issued late on Thursday.
Rejecting an auditor's plea that there was uncertainty about the payment of dues due to discussions with lenders, NFRA said that even if the company is incapable of paying back dues and management does not acknowledge it as payable, contractual obligations like interest payments are still to be recognised as liabilities by the company.
NFRA debarred an Ahmedabad-based auditor for one year and imposed a monetary penalty of ?100,000 in the case which involved audit of a clothing company after its investigation found alleged irregularities in the financial statements of FY16.
The company had not recognised accrued interest on loans from bank and non-banking finance companies in violation of sections of the Companies Act and the auditing standards, NFRA said. "With proper accounting of interest accrued, the reported loss of the company would have increased by about eight times," the regulator said.
Such a material and pervasive misstatement in the financial statement of the company was not reported by the audit engagement partner in his auditor's report, NFRA pointed out. The various instances of non-compliance with the format of financial statements have also been noted, which have not been reported by the engagement partner in the auditor's report, NFRA said.
NFRA imposed the penalty, alleging it has found the audit engagement partner guilty of professional misconduct.
The auditor informed the regulator that the management was in negotiations with the bank for a one-time settlement of the loan and hence, in his professional judgment, no additional interest expenses were payable to clear the dues of the bank. The partner also referred to a no-dues certificate from the bank issued in 2018 showing the loan was settled through a one-time settlement. The auditor claimed that the judgment exercised by him at the time of the audit to agree with the decision of the management not to recognise further interest was neither misplaced nor without a proper basis, the regulator's order showed.
NFRA held the auditor guilty of failure to disclose material facts known to him, which are not disclosed in a financial statement, but the disclosure of which was necessary in making such a financial statement.
The audit regulator pointed out that there was no evidence of a firm commitment from the bank on waiver of interest at the time of the audit of FY16 financial statements. The settlement with the bank came into effect only in 2018, that is, 19 months after the signing of the balance sheet by the auditor in 2016.
The audit engagement partner is using subsequent developments, that took place over one and a half years to justify his actions at the time of statutory audit, NFRA pointed out.
"The accrual concept in accounting requires a company to record revenue and expenses in the period they are earned or incurred, regardless of when the related cash transactions occur. Liabilities, including contractual obligations, are recognized in the financial statements when they are incurred, even if payment is not due until a later period. This means that contractual obligations that are incapable of being fulfilled are still recognized as liabilities by a company, even if they are not acknowledged any longer by the management," NFRA said in its order. (ends)
Category : NFRA | Comments : 0 | Hits : 686
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000
Comments