News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
NFRA may soon settle disciplinary cases of Auditors
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has said that it will propose to the government that it be allowed to settle disciplinary cases of auditors that do not require determination of professional misconduct.
NFRA’s plan follows a technical advisory panel set up by the audit watchdog making a strong case for such a proposal. The panel said settlement of disciplinary matters by the watchdog will speed up enforcement and reduce time. It also referred to capital market regulator Sebi which has rules in place for settlement of disciplinary issues under securities laws.
The panel said in its recommendations that NFRA should consider the desirability and feasibility of a policy of settlement in disciplinary cases. Currently, NFRA can debar an auditor or impose monetary penalty for misconduct, but it involves investigation and adjudication. This also could lead to litigation. The panel said the US audit watchdog Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and UK’s Financial Reporting Council have provisions for settlement of disciplinary cases prior to adjudication.
NFRA has sought comments from the public until 10 July on the panel’s recommendations, which seeks to grow its engagement experts, auditors and investors among stakeholders.
In its preliminary response to the panel’s recommendation, NFRA said it appreciated the reasoning but pointed out that settlement procedures require statutory backing. “NFRA will examine the matter further and take it up with the government appropriately, if found warranted. NFRA looks at a likely statutory settlement process as one element of a comprehensive stand-alone legislation that, ideally, should cover all aspects of NFRA’s functioning. This is the pattern that has been followed in the case of other regulators as well," the watchdog said.
“NFRA will work on the draft of such a law," the regulator said. NFRA has also sought feedback on a plan to step up its engagement with stakeholders including investors, academics, chief financial officers and auditors.
The move is expected to please the audit services industry which has often complained about an expectation gap between what auditors do and what regulators expect from them when companies they certified faces instances of fraud or genuine financial collapse.
NFRA’s plan follows a technical advisory panel set up by the audit watchdog making a strong case for such a proposal. The panel said settlement of disciplinary matters by the watchdog will speed up enforcement and reduce time. It also referred to capital market regulator Sebi which has rules in place for settlement of disciplinary issues under securities laws.
The panel said in its recommendations that NFRA should consider the desirability and feasibility of a policy of settlement in disciplinary cases. Currently, NFRA can debar an auditor or impose monetary penalty for misconduct, but it involves investigation and adjudication. This also could lead to litigation. The panel said the US audit watchdog Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and UK’s Financial Reporting Council have provisions for settlement of disciplinary cases prior to adjudication.
NFRA has sought comments from the public until 10 July on the panel’s recommendations, which seeks to grow its engagement experts, auditors and investors among stakeholders.
In its preliminary response to the panel’s recommendation, NFRA said it appreciated the reasoning but pointed out that settlement procedures require statutory backing. “NFRA will examine the matter further and take it up with the government appropriately, if found warranted. NFRA looks at a likely statutory settlement process as one element of a comprehensive stand-alone legislation that, ideally, should cover all aspects of NFRA’s functioning. This is the pattern that has been followed in the case of other regulators as well," the watchdog said.
“NFRA will work on the draft of such a law," the regulator said. NFRA has also sought feedback on a plan to step up its engagement with stakeholders including investors, academics, chief financial officers and auditors.
The move is expected to please the audit services industry which has often complained about an expectation gap between what auditors do and what regulators expect from them when companies they certified faces instances of fraud or genuine financial collapse.
Category : NFRA | Comments : 0 | Hits : 844
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments