News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
NFRA to crack down on Big 4, Other Auditors on Non Audit Services
Auditors, including the Big Four, may come under stringent scrutiny by the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) for providing “non-audit services” to the same clients of which they are the statutory auditors, according to people privy to the regulator’s plans.
The NFRA’s move to evaluate the practice with a critical eye could, however, spark a fresh row, as the legal grounds of its action are seen to be contentious. Also, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India’s (ICAI) guidance note, which complies with the norms of International Federation of Accountants, is rather lenient on this aspect.
Currently, every auditor – independent or with an auditing firm – has to follow a code of ethics defined by the ICAI, but non-audit work isn’t prohibited under the code.
Of course, Section 144 of the Companies Act 2013 doesn’t allow statutory auditors to render a handful of services such as internal audits, actuarial, investment banking/advisory, management, outsourced financial services, book keeping services, etc. to their clients. However, there are plenty of other services that they can offer to their clients and their subsidiaries, including administrative, consultancy, forensics, fact-finding, diligence services, etc.
However, the NFRA could draw power to regulate rendering services other than listed under Section 144, by invoking an entry that suggests prohibition could be extended to “any other kind of services as may be prescribed”.
“A client can come up with hundreds of demands. The accountants have to do the assessment, and evaluate the work offered to them so that it doesn’t threaten their independence. This is where it gets tricky because the regulator can arbitrarily find some or all of those non-audit services problematic due to the conflict of interest with the statutory audit job or for some other reasons,” said a partner with a leading audit firm who didn’t wish not to be identified.
Nearly all large audit firms – Deloitte India, PwC, EY India, Grant Thornton, KPMG India etc. – refrain from providing non-audit services to the listed entities for which they are statutory auditors, as an act of extra vigilance and in order to safeguard their reputation. But they are not as circumspect when it comes to rendering such services to unlisted firms. “The NFRA’s move, if correct, would make the work of auditors difficult. It might be tantamount to over-regulation, as it goes beyond internationally accepted practice,” said Ved Jain, noted chartered accountant and former president of ICAI.
Typically, many of the non-audit services are lucrative for the audit firms, while auditing per se may not invariably be very profitable, given the high costs involved. “The idea is to desist from performing only those management services for the firms, which they are supposed to undertake themselves. For instance, GST paperwork,” said Jain.
The ICAI’s 20-page guidance note on “Independence of auditors” states that independence is “a very subjective matter.” “One person might be independent in a particular set of circumstances, while another person might feel he is not independent in similar circumstances,” as per the note.
“Inspecting the non-audit work is a favourite area for NFRA. All the five inspection reports issued by NFRA last year have cited issues with non-audit work offered by the audit firms or related entities,” said founder of an accounting firm, on condition of anonymity.
NFRA, which was formed in 2018, has been busy issuing orders against auditors involved in professional misconduct. It’s also conducting inspections on large firms to find lapses in their existing practices, and making them take corrective measures.
The NFRA’s move to evaluate the practice with a critical eye could, however, spark a fresh row, as the legal grounds of its action are seen to be contentious. Also, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India’s (ICAI) guidance note, which complies with the norms of International Federation of Accountants, is rather lenient on this aspect.
Currently, every auditor – independent or with an auditing firm – has to follow a code of ethics defined by the ICAI, but non-audit work isn’t prohibited under the code.
Of course, Section 144 of the Companies Act 2013 doesn’t allow statutory auditors to render a handful of services such as internal audits, actuarial, investment banking/advisory, management, outsourced financial services, book keeping services, etc. to their clients. However, there are plenty of other services that they can offer to their clients and their subsidiaries, including administrative, consultancy, forensics, fact-finding, diligence services, etc.
However, the NFRA could draw power to regulate rendering services other than listed under Section 144, by invoking an entry that suggests prohibition could be extended to “any other kind of services as may be prescribed”.
“A client can come up with hundreds of demands. The accountants have to do the assessment, and evaluate the work offered to them so that it doesn’t threaten their independence. This is where it gets tricky because the regulator can arbitrarily find some or all of those non-audit services problematic due to the conflict of interest with the statutory audit job or for some other reasons,” said a partner with a leading audit firm who didn’t wish not to be identified.
Nearly all large audit firms – Deloitte India, PwC, EY India, Grant Thornton, KPMG India etc. – refrain from providing non-audit services to the listed entities for which they are statutory auditors, as an act of extra vigilance and in order to safeguard their reputation. But they are not as circumspect when it comes to rendering such services to unlisted firms. “The NFRA’s move, if correct, would make the work of auditors difficult. It might be tantamount to over-regulation, as it goes beyond internationally accepted practice,” said Ved Jain, noted chartered accountant and former president of ICAI.
Typically, many of the non-audit services are lucrative for the audit firms, while auditing per se may not invariably be very profitable, given the high costs involved. “The idea is to desist from performing only those management services for the firms, which they are supposed to undertake themselves. For instance, GST paperwork,” said Jain.
The ICAI’s 20-page guidance note on “Independence of auditors” states that independence is “a very subjective matter.” “One person might be independent in a particular set of circumstances, while another person might feel he is not independent in similar circumstances,” as per the note.
“Inspecting the non-audit work is a favourite area for NFRA. All the five inspection reports issued by NFRA last year have cited issues with non-audit work offered by the audit firms or related entities,” said founder of an accounting firm, on condition of anonymity.
NFRA, which was formed in 2018, has been busy issuing orders against auditors involved in professional misconduct. It’s also conducting inspections on large firms to find lapses in their existing practices, and making them take corrective measures.
Category : NFRA | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1855
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments