News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
RBI asks PSB auditors to step up vigil, spot SCAMS
Battling with frauds and dodgy borrowers, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has asked auditors of state-owned banks to watch out for unrealistic cash-flow projections that corporates often make to obtain new loans or rejig old loans to buy time. The regulator, at a meeting last week, also told them to account for the divergence in sticky loans between RBI inspection report and audited numbers before finalising balance-sheet.
“Many companies agree to ballooning debt repayment terms at the time of loan restructuring. But there are questions whether the future earnings can be robust enough to support such higher debt service obligations,” said a senior chartered accountant who was one of the 40-odd auditors to attend the meeting with senior officials of RBI.
The auditors will have to ensure that balance-sheets not only disclose the differences between the RBI’s observations for the previous financial year and the corresponding audited accounts, but also provide for it in the current year.
“Due to high NPAs and emergence of new wilful defaulters, regulator’s expectations from auditors have increased. RBI wants us to anticipate the inherent weaknesses in the book, step up vigil… But certain issues like ‘gold plating’ of projects may be difficult for statutory auditors to spot,” said another person who was present in the meeting.
In the course of the meeting, which was held a month after the fraud perpetrated by jeweller Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi surfaced, one of the RBI officials outlined the central bank’s fraud monitoring framework. Among the early warning signals pointed out were critical issues highlighted in stock audit report, poor disclosure of materially adverse information, frequent change in the scope of project, not routing sales through consortium member bank, letters of credit issued for related parties, tax raids and significant drop in promoters’ stake.
The meeting was called at a point when a large number of banks are preparing for large one-time loss in the quarter ending March 31, 2018 in line with RBI’s revised guidelines on resolution of stressed assets.
“Banks, however, will be spared of the new accounting standard (IAS) that was supposed to come into effect from April 1, 2018. In all likelihood it would be postponed... that’s the impression we gathered from the meeting,” said one of the persons quoted above.
The new accounting rule would have called for provisioning against expected credit loss. It’s widely perceived that such a norm could erode the capital of several public sector banks which are already saddled with bad loans.
Another presentation by an RBI general manager made it explicitly clear that all restructured loans will now attract provisioning (and thus impact bank profits).
Till last year, restructured loans under specific schemes were treated as standard or regular loans. Now, it has to be treated as non-performing assets which would call for provisioning of 15% or 25% or even higher given the quality of the asset. #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
“Many companies agree to ballooning debt repayment terms at the time of loan restructuring. But there are questions whether the future earnings can be robust enough to support such higher debt service obligations,” said a senior chartered accountant who was one of the 40-odd auditors to attend the meeting with senior officials of RBI.
The auditors will have to ensure that balance-sheets not only disclose the differences between the RBI’s observations for the previous financial year and the corresponding audited accounts, but also provide for it in the current year.
“Due to high NPAs and emergence of new wilful defaulters, regulator’s expectations from auditors have increased. RBI wants us to anticipate the inherent weaknesses in the book, step up vigil… But certain issues like ‘gold plating’ of projects may be difficult for statutory auditors to spot,” said another person who was present in the meeting.
In the course of the meeting, which was held a month after the fraud perpetrated by jeweller Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi surfaced, one of the RBI officials outlined the central bank’s fraud monitoring framework. Among the early warning signals pointed out were critical issues highlighted in stock audit report, poor disclosure of materially adverse information, frequent change in the scope of project, not routing sales through consortium member bank, letters of credit issued for related parties, tax raids and significant drop in promoters’ stake.
The meeting was called at a point when a large number of banks are preparing for large one-time loss in the quarter ending March 31, 2018 in line with RBI’s revised guidelines on resolution of stressed assets.
“Banks, however, will be spared of the new accounting standard (IAS) that was supposed to come into effect from April 1, 2018. In all likelihood it would be postponed... that’s the impression we gathered from the meeting,” said one of the persons quoted above.
The new accounting rule would have called for provisioning against expected credit loss. It’s widely perceived that such a norm could erode the capital of several public sector banks which are already saddled with bad loans.
Another presentation by an RBI general manager made it explicitly clear that all restructured loans will now attract provisioning (and thus impact bank profits).
Till last year, restructured loans under specific schemes were treated as standard or regular loans. Now, it has to be treated as non-performing assets which would call for provisioning of 15% or 25% or even higher given the quality of the asset. #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
Category : RBI | Comments : 1 | Hits : 870
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments
KAPIL MITTAL
22-Mar-2018 , 07:20:56 amIn fact there is need for checking the quality of RBI inspections and its frequency. There is also need for increase in fee of concurrent auditors of branches so that they can devote more time in audit at branches. Delay in compliances by branches with concurrent audit qualifictaions and observations should invite penalties for defaulting officers / staff & branch incharge of auditee branch