News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
RBI imposes Rs 2 crore penalty on IDFC Bank, Rs 6 crore on Yes Bank
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday slapped a Rs6 crore penalty on Yes Bank Ltd for breaching its rules on classifying non-performing assets and failing to report a security incident involving its ATMs on time. Separately, RBI also imposed a Rs2 crore penalty on IDFC Bank Ltd for breaching regulations on giving loans.
In a notification, RBI said Yes Bank violated the Income Recognition Asset Classification (IRAC) norms on dealing with assessment of bad loans as of March-end 2016. Yes Bank was one of three private sector lenders which had reported a sharp divergence between their asset quality classification and provisioning for 2015-16, and what the RBI deemed necessary.
In its annual report for 2016-17, the bank said its bad loan classification of Rs748.9 crore at the end of March 2016 varied from that of RBI to the tune of Rs4,176 crore.
RBI’s bad loan assessment was 558% more than what Yes Bank had reported.
RBI also said Yes Bank failed to report a cyber-security attack on its ATM network within the prescribed timeframe.
Card data of 3.2 million users was stolen between 25 May and 10 July 2016 from a network of Yes Bank ATMs managed by Hitachi Payment Services Pvt. Ltd, but it was only in September that year that banks and payments services providers became aware of the extent of the breach, Mint reported on 20 October 2016.
“The statutory inspection of the bank with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2016 revealed, inter alia, violations of various regulations issued by RBI in the assessment of Non-performing Assets (NPAs). A cyber-security incident involving ATMs of the bank was also not reported by the bank within the prescribed timeframe,” said RBI in its notification.
Phone calls to a Yes Bank spokesperson had not elicited a response at the time of going to press.
In the case of IDFC Bank, RBI said the bank failed to comply with the regulations pertainting to sanction/renewal of loans and advances.
“The status report of the bank based on its financial position as on December 31, 2016, revealed, inter alia, non-adherence with certain directions pertaining to sanction/renewal of loans and advances,” the notification said.
“This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers,” it added.
IDFC Bank declined to comment. #casansaar (Source - LIveMint)
In a notification, RBI said Yes Bank violated the Income Recognition Asset Classification (IRAC) norms on dealing with assessment of bad loans as of March-end 2016. Yes Bank was one of three private sector lenders which had reported a sharp divergence between their asset quality classification and provisioning for 2015-16, and what the RBI deemed necessary.
In its annual report for 2016-17, the bank said its bad loan classification of Rs748.9 crore at the end of March 2016 varied from that of RBI to the tune of Rs4,176 crore.
RBI’s bad loan assessment was 558% more than what Yes Bank had reported.
RBI also said Yes Bank failed to report a cyber-security attack on its ATM network within the prescribed timeframe.
Card data of 3.2 million users was stolen between 25 May and 10 July 2016 from a network of Yes Bank ATMs managed by Hitachi Payment Services Pvt. Ltd, but it was only in September that year that banks and payments services providers became aware of the extent of the breach, Mint reported on 20 October 2016.
“The statutory inspection of the bank with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2016 revealed, inter alia, violations of various regulations issued by RBI in the assessment of Non-performing Assets (NPAs). A cyber-security incident involving ATMs of the bank was also not reported by the bank within the prescribed timeframe,” said RBI in its notification.
Phone calls to a Yes Bank spokesperson had not elicited a response at the time of going to press.
In the case of IDFC Bank, RBI said the bank failed to comply with the regulations pertainting to sanction/renewal of loans and advances.
“The status report of the bank based on its financial position as on December 31, 2016, revealed, inter alia, non-adherence with certain directions pertaining to sanction/renewal of loans and advances,” the notification said.
“This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers,” it added.
IDFC Bank declined to comment. #casansaar (Source - LIveMint)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 525
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments