News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
RBI issues revised norms for hiring of bank lockers
The Reserve Bank on Wednesday came out with revised guidelines for the hiring of lockers under which the liability of banks will be limited to 100 times its annual rent in case of fire, theft, building collapse or frauds by bank employees.
As per the revised guidelines, which shall come into effect from January 1, 2022, banks will be required to incorporate a clause in the locker agreement prohibiting the hirer from keeping anything illegal or hazardous in lockers.
The RBI said it has reviewed the 'Deposit Locker/Safe Custody Article Facility provided by the banks' after taking into consideration various developments in the area of banking and technology, nature of consumer grievances and also the feedback received from banks and Indian Banks' Association (IBA). The review also takes into account, the principles enumerated by the Supreme Court in 'Amitabha Dasgupta vs United Bank of India'.
The revised instructions will be applicable to both new and existing safe deposit lockers and the safe custody of articles facility with the banks.
The RBI said banks need to maintain a branch-wise list of vacant lockers as well as a wait-list in Core Banking System (CBS) or any other computerised system compliant with Cyber Security Framework, for the purpose of allotment of lockers and ensure transparency in allotment of lockers.
"The banks shall acknowledge the receipt of all applications for allotment of locker and provide a wait list number to the customers, if the lockers are not available for allotment," as per the instructions.
Banks would also need to adopt the model locker agreement to be framed by IBA.
The RBI has also detailed the compensation policy and liability of banks in the revised instructions.
The banks will have to put in place a Board-approved policy outlining the responsibility owed by them for any loss or damage to the contents of the lockers due to their negligence.
"The bank shall not be liable for any damage and/or loss of contents of locker arising from natural calamities or Acts of God like earthquake, floods, lightning and thunderstorm or any act that is attributable to the sole fault or negligence of the customer," it said.
Banks should, however, exercise appropriate care to their locker systems to protect their premises from such catastrophes.
Also, it is the responsibility of banks to take all steps for the safety and security of the premises in which the safe deposit vaults are housed.
"As banks cannot claim that they bear no liability towards their customers for loss of contents of the locker, in instances where loss of contents of locker are due incidents (like fire, theft/ burglary/ robbery, dacoity,) or attributable to fraud committed by its employee(s), the banks' liability shall be for an amount equivalent to one hundred times the prevailing annual rent of the safe deposit locker," it said.
On locker rent, the RBI said that to ensure prompt payment of locker rent, banks are allowed to obtain a Term Deposit, at the time of allotment, which would cover three years' rent and the charges for breaking open the locker in case of such eventuality.
Banks, however, should not insist on such Term Deposits from the existing locker holders or those who have a satisfactory operative account, it said.
"The packaging of allotment of locker facility with the placement of term deposits beyond what is specifically permitted ... will be considered as a restrictive practice," it added.
Banks will have the discretion to break open any locker following due procedure if the rent has not been paid by the customer for three years in a row.
One of the country's large state-owned banks charges Rs 2,000 as annual rent for a small safe deposit locker and Rs 4,000 for a medium sized one in urban and metro areas. The annual rent for a large locker is Rs 8,000. In addition, a customer has to also pay the applicable GST.
As per the revised guidelines, which shall come into effect from January 1, 2022, banks will be required to incorporate a clause in the locker agreement prohibiting the hirer from keeping anything illegal or hazardous in lockers.
The RBI said it has reviewed the 'Deposit Locker/Safe Custody Article Facility provided by the banks' after taking into consideration various developments in the area of banking and technology, nature of consumer grievances and also the feedback received from banks and Indian Banks' Association (IBA). The review also takes into account, the principles enumerated by the Supreme Court in 'Amitabha Dasgupta vs United Bank of India'.
The revised instructions will be applicable to both new and existing safe deposit lockers and the safe custody of articles facility with the banks.
The RBI said banks need to maintain a branch-wise list of vacant lockers as well as a wait-list in Core Banking System (CBS) or any other computerised system compliant with Cyber Security Framework, for the purpose of allotment of lockers and ensure transparency in allotment of lockers.
"The banks shall acknowledge the receipt of all applications for allotment of locker and provide a wait list number to the customers, if the lockers are not available for allotment," as per the instructions.
Banks would also need to adopt the model locker agreement to be framed by IBA.
The RBI has also detailed the compensation policy and liability of banks in the revised instructions.
The banks will have to put in place a Board-approved policy outlining the responsibility owed by them for any loss or damage to the contents of the lockers due to their negligence.
"The bank shall not be liable for any damage and/or loss of contents of locker arising from natural calamities or Acts of God like earthquake, floods, lightning and thunderstorm or any act that is attributable to the sole fault or negligence of the customer," it said.
Banks should, however, exercise appropriate care to their locker systems to protect their premises from such catastrophes.
Also, it is the responsibility of banks to take all steps for the safety and security of the premises in which the safe deposit vaults are housed.
"As banks cannot claim that they bear no liability towards their customers for loss of contents of the locker, in instances where loss of contents of locker are due incidents (like fire, theft/ burglary/ robbery, dacoity,) or attributable to fraud committed by its employee(s), the banks' liability shall be for an amount equivalent to one hundred times the prevailing annual rent of the safe deposit locker," it said.
On locker rent, the RBI said that to ensure prompt payment of locker rent, banks are allowed to obtain a Term Deposit, at the time of allotment, which would cover three years' rent and the charges for breaking open the locker in case of such eventuality.
Banks, however, should not insist on such Term Deposits from the existing locker holders or those who have a satisfactory operative account, it said.
"The packaging of allotment of locker facility with the placement of term deposits beyond what is specifically permitted ... will be considered as a restrictive practice," it added.
Banks will have the discretion to break open any locker following due procedure if the rent has not been paid by the customer for three years in a row.
One of the country's large state-owned banks charges Rs 2,000 as annual rent for a small safe deposit locker and Rs 4,000 for a medium sized one in urban and metro areas. The annual rent for a large locker is Rs 8,000. In addition, a customer has to also pay the applicable GST.
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 1320
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments