RBI tweaks shareholding norms for private sector banks
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) today issued new guidelines on ownership in private sector banks by bundling shareholding patterns into two broad categories of individuals (natural persons) and legal entities/institutions, but retained the cap on foreign ownership at 74 per cent.
The new norms, which envisage diversified shareholding in private sector banks by a single entity/corporate entity/group of related entities, are aimed at helping them meet the additional capital under the Basel-III regulations and to rationalise the ownership limits, the RBI said.
Bundling the ownership limits for all shareholders into two broad categories of natural persons (individuals) and legal persons (entities/institutions), the RBI has stipulated separate limits for non-financial and financial institutions, which have been divvied into diversified and non-diversified institutions.
“For all existing banks, the permitted promoter/promoter group shareholding will be in line with what has been permitted in the February 22, 2013 guidelines on licensing of universal banks at 15 per cent,” it said.
In case any promoter/promoter group is eligible for higher shareholding as per the licensing guidelines, the same will apply and the limits prescribed for all shareholders in the long run will not apply.
“In case of financial institutions that are owned to the extent of 50 per cent or more or controlled by individuals, the shareholding would be deemed to be by a natural person and the shareholding will be capped at 10 per cent,” RBI said.
Under the new norms, the RBI has retained the provision of seeking its prior mandate if someone wants to increase shareholding/voting rights to 5 per cent or more.
Similarly, it said the ‘fit and proper’ criterion for acquisition of shareholding in a private bank beyond 5 per cent will continue to apply.
Acquisition of shareholding in a private sector bank by foreign entities will continue to be subject to the extant FDI policy, and the aggregate foreign ownership through FDI, FII/NRIs cannot exceed 74 per cent of paid-up capital.
“At all times, at least 26 per cent of the paid-up share capital of the private sector banks will have to be held by resident Indians,” it said.
Banks, including foreign ones having branch presence here, can continue to acquire stake in a bank’s equity shares up to 10 per cent of the investee bank’s equity capital. But in case of exceptional circumstances, such as restructuring of problem/weak banks or in the interest of consolidation in the banking sector, the Reserve Bank may permit them a higher level of shareholding.
In those banks where there are no major regulatory/ supervisory concerns, a person may be permitted to acquire higher shareholding, if the same is supported by the board. In such banks, hostile takeover will not be allowed.
In banks where there are regulatory/supervisory concerns and, if the Reserve Bank feels that there is a need for a change in the ownership/management of the bank in the interests of the depositors of the bank, the Reserve Bank may permit a person to acquire higher shareholding, even if the existing board does not support the same. Such a person may or may not be an existing shareholder. #casansaar (Financial Express)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 289
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments