News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
RBI weighs incentives for banks to move IBC
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is understood to be weighing a plan to ‘incentivise’ lenders to take errant borrowers to bankruptcy court.
It’s part of the regulatory countermove that RBI is working on to overcome hurdles in the wake of a recent Supreme Court ruling. A month ago, the apex court struck down RBI’s February 12, 2018 directive that gave defaulting companies 180 days to agree on a resolution plan with lenders or be taken to bankruptcy court to recover debt of Rs 2,000 crore and above.
According to people aware of the matter, RBI is considering a proposal to assign a ‘lower risk weight’ on loans to companies against which action has been initiated under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016.
“A lower risk weight would act as an incentive to banks as it would help them in conserving capital. It would be a regulatory change that would be very much within RBI’s domain,” a person familiar with the proposal told ET.
Lower risk weights on loans would make it easier for banks to achieve and maintain capital adequacy ratio.
Capital adequacy ratio determines the quantum of loan a bank can disburse at a given level of capital (i.e, equity and free reserves). A bank has to live with a string of business restrictions if its capital adequacy slips below the floor set by the regulator.
“A lower risk weights on IBC companies should be an acceptable regulation — simply because initiating corporate insolvency is a step towards resolution of NPAs (non-performing assets),” said a senior banker.
After the apex court ruled that the February 12, 2018 circular was beyond the scope of the RBI’s powers, the regulator has been working on a new framework for debt resolution and invoking the corporate insolvency code. “Since it would not be possible (post the court ruling) for RBI to fix a deadline of 180 days or even 1 year (from the day of default) for banks to invoke the insolvency law, it’s thinking of ways to incentivise lenders for using the IBC,” said a banker. Under the circumstances lower risk weights could be an element in the new action plan to salvage sunk loans.
ET’s email to an RBI spokesperson went unanswered till the time of going to press.
According to the insolvency law, any financial creditor (among other creditors) can file an insolvency petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which was formed to resolve corporate disputes, improve ease of doing business, and enable quicker implementation of the bankruptcy code. Within 14 days, the tribunal has to pass an order for insolvency resolution.
Once NCLT passes its order, the seriousness of the code becomes apparent: an insolvency practitioner steps in to take possession of the company's assets, replace the board with a committee of creditors, issue public notices, and run the company as a going concern. In the next 180 days, which can be stretched by another 90 days , a resolution package comprising a debt rejig, entry of new investors, infusion of fund by promoters, among other conditions is drawn up. The company goes into liquidation if either the management or creditors with at least 75% of the outstanding loans turn down the revival package.
There is a widely shared perception that the culture of loan recovery and repayment that IBC was beginning to inculcate would suffer following the Supreme Court ruling because neither lenders would be forced to move bankruptcy court nor corporates would be under pressure to regularise loan servicing.
RBI had often raised or lowered risk weights on loans to either deter loans to certain businesses such as stock broking, real estate and commodities, or encourage lending to segments like agriculture. (If risk weight on a loan is 75% and capital adequacy is 9%, the minimum capital a bank needs for a loan portfolio of Rs100 crore is Rs 6.75 crore (100 *0.75*0.09).) #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
It’s part of the regulatory countermove that RBI is working on to overcome hurdles in the wake of a recent Supreme Court ruling. A month ago, the apex court struck down RBI’s February 12, 2018 directive that gave defaulting companies 180 days to agree on a resolution plan with lenders or be taken to bankruptcy court to recover debt of Rs 2,000 crore and above.
According to people aware of the matter, RBI is considering a proposal to assign a ‘lower risk weight’ on loans to companies against which action has been initiated under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016.
“A lower risk weight would act as an incentive to banks as it would help them in conserving capital. It would be a regulatory change that would be very much within RBI’s domain,” a person familiar with the proposal told ET.
Lower risk weights on loans would make it easier for banks to achieve and maintain capital adequacy ratio.
Capital adequacy ratio determines the quantum of loan a bank can disburse at a given level of capital (i.e, equity and free reserves). A bank has to live with a string of business restrictions if its capital adequacy slips below the floor set by the regulator.
“A lower risk weights on IBC companies should be an acceptable regulation — simply because initiating corporate insolvency is a step towards resolution of NPAs (non-performing assets),” said a senior banker.
After the apex court ruled that the February 12, 2018 circular was beyond the scope of the RBI’s powers, the regulator has been working on a new framework for debt resolution and invoking the corporate insolvency code. “Since it would not be possible (post the court ruling) for RBI to fix a deadline of 180 days or even 1 year (from the day of default) for banks to invoke the insolvency law, it’s thinking of ways to incentivise lenders for using the IBC,” said a banker. Under the circumstances lower risk weights could be an element in the new action plan to salvage sunk loans.
ET’s email to an RBI spokesperson went unanswered till the time of going to press.
According to the insolvency law, any financial creditor (among other creditors) can file an insolvency petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which was formed to resolve corporate disputes, improve ease of doing business, and enable quicker implementation of the bankruptcy code. Within 14 days, the tribunal has to pass an order for insolvency resolution.
Once NCLT passes its order, the seriousness of the code becomes apparent: an insolvency practitioner steps in to take possession of the company's assets, replace the board with a committee of creditors, issue public notices, and run the company as a going concern. In the next 180 days, which can be stretched by another 90 days , a resolution package comprising a debt rejig, entry of new investors, infusion of fund by promoters, among other conditions is drawn up. The company goes into liquidation if either the management or creditors with at least 75% of the outstanding loans turn down the revival package.
There is a widely shared perception that the culture of loan recovery and repayment that IBC was beginning to inculcate would suffer following the Supreme Court ruling because neither lenders would be forced to move bankruptcy court nor corporates would be under pressure to regularise loan servicing.
RBI had often raised or lowered risk weights on loans to either deter loans to certain businesses such as stock broking, real estate and commodities, or encourage lending to segments like agriculture. (If risk weight on a loan is 75% and capital adequacy is 9%, the minimum capital a bank needs for a loan portfolio of Rs100 crore is Rs 6.75 crore (100 *0.75*0.09).) #casansaar (Source - Economic Times)
Category : RBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 943
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments