News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
SEBI asks AIFs to give full disclosure on Associates
Alternative investment funds (AIFs), having foreign entities as "associates", are rattled by the latest Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) directive to disclose the entire disciplinary history of sponsors, managers, directors, partners, promoters and associates in their placement memorandum.
In a recent informal guidance released by the market regulator, it has asked Peninsula Brookfield India Real Estate Fund (PBIREF) — a Sebi-registered Alternative Investment Fund — to disclose the entire history of various regulatory actions against its associates, even if they are located outside India, in the placement memorandum.
Brookfield, which manages over $200 billion of assets with 24,000 odd employees in over 100 offices in 20 different countries, now has to provide the disciplinary history of its sponsors, managers, directors, partners, promoters and associates to Sebi due to the global asset management company's tie-up with Peninsula for the Peninsula Brookfield India Real Estate Fund in India. Securities lawyers feel that Sebi is casting the net far too wide.
"Several AIFs registered with Sebi having "associates" outside India may be concerned as this information was neither sought by Sebi at the time of registration nor did the AIF Regulations explicitly state that this information is to be made available to the investors in the placement memorandum," said Yogesh Chande, partner at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas.
"Neither did the clarification circular issued by Sebi in June 2014 expressly ask for disclosure of "associates" outside India."
AIFs are funds established or incorporated in India for the purpose of pooling in capital from Indian and foreign investors for investing as per the investment norms prescribed in the AIF Regulations. There were around 135 AIFs registered with Sebi as on March 31, 2015.
As per Regulation 2(1)(c) of AIF Regulations, "associate" means a company, LLP or a body corporate in which a director or trustee or partner or sponsor or manager of the AIF or a director or a partner of the manager or sponsor holds, either individually or collectively, more than 15% of its paid-up equity share capital or partnership interest.
"AIFs which have partners from outside India may find it challenging and cumbersome to comply with the regulatory stance taken by the Sebi," said a senior official from a registered AIF.
Some, however, say this could improve corporate governance. "Though Sebi's new compliance requirements may be burdensome in terms of paper work, it will improve the transparency in the system," said PR Ramesh, senior consultant, Economic Law Practice. "It's the right of investors to know the details of managers who are managing their fund." (Economic Times)
In a recent informal guidance released by the market regulator, it has asked Peninsula Brookfield India Real Estate Fund (PBIREF) — a Sebi-registered Alternative Investment Fund — to disclose the entire history of various regulatory actions against its associates, even if they are located outside India, in the placement memorandum.
Brookfield, which manages over $200 billion of assets with 24,000 odd employees in over 100 offices in 20 different countries, now has to provide the disciplinary history of its sponsors, managers, directors, partners, promoters and associates to Sebi due to the global asset management company's tie-up with Peninsula for the Peninsula Brookfield India Real Estate Fund in India. Securities lawyers feel that Sebi is casting the net far too wide.
"Several AIFs registered with Sebi having "associates" outside India may be concerned as this information was neither sought by Sebi at the time of registration nor did the AIF Regulations explicitly state that this information is to be made available to the investors in the placement memorandum," said Yogesh Chande, partner at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas.
"Neither did the clarification circular issued by Sebi in June 2014 expressly ask for disclosure of "associates" outside India."
AIFs are funds established or incorporated in India for the purpose of pooling in capital from Indian and foreign investors for investing as per the investment norms prescribed in the AIF Regulations. There were around 135 AIFs registered with Sebi as on March 31, 2015.
As per Regulation 2(1)(c) of AIF Regulations, "associate" means a company, LLP or a body corporate in which a director or trustee or partner or sponsor or manager of the AIF or a director or a partner of the manager or sponsor holds, either individually or collectively, more than 15% of its paid-up equity share capital or partnership interest.
"AIFs which have partners from outside India may find it challenging and cumbersome to comply with the regulatory stance taken by the Sebi," said a senior official from a registered AIF.
Some, however, say this could improve corporate governance. "Though Sebi's new compliance requirements may be burdensome in terms of paper work, it will improve the transparency in the system," said PR Ramesh, senior consultant, Economic Law Practice. "It's the right of investors to know the details of managers who are managing their fund." (Economic Times)
Category : SEBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 304
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments