SEBI plans including individual traders in definition of illegal practice
PrintListen to this Article
Front-running refers to the practice of using confidential information for buying or selling securities, owned by a broker or trader, ahead of future trades to take advantage of the price movement.
The need for a review of the regulations has risen in the wake of a recent Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) ruling setting aside a SEBI order on grounds that current regulations on Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Markets Regulations, 2003, (FUTP Regulations) do not clearly define the term “front-running,” and even if a particular fraudulent transaction can be construed as front-running, it applies only to market intermediaries and not individuals.
According to the November 9 order, Dipak Patel, an investment advisor with an FII had allegedly indulged in front-running by passing on information about future trades to his cousins. The trades occurred between 2007 and 2009. According to SEBI’s probe, Patel and his cousins made profits of Rs 1.56 crore through these trades. While the regulator barred Patel from the securities market, his cousins were directed to deposit the profits to the tune of R1.03 crore.
However, SAT overruled the order citing reasons that SEBI regulations pertained to offences committed by intermediaries and not individuals.
“Front running as an offence is definitely pursued to be for intermediaries. So (does) somebody who is an indirect beneficiary come under the purview or not. Of course common sense and justice demands that it should be there,” said SEBI chairman U.K. Sinha on Friday.
“On this particular aspect of front-running, we will have to look at our regulations to see if it needs more improvement and strengthening,” he further added.
Elaborating on the issue’s relevance in the context of the recent amendment in insider trading regulations, Mr Sinha said: “In insider trading, the regulations were different earlier. But now the regulations are that even if you are in the know of that information, whether we are able to establish whether you have used that information or not is immaterial; the very fact that you are possessing that information is enough for us. Given this particular example we will need to have a serious look at our regulation.”
Market experts are divided over the definition of the word “intermediaries” and argue that individuals should also be included to avoid fraud and protect investors. (The Hindu)
Category : SEBI | Comments : 0 | Hits : 297
A financial influencer, also known as finfluencer, who was also involved in imparting training related to stock market trading has been asked to part with a little over ?12 crore, which it made unlawfully. The funds are to be credited or deposited by Ravindra Balu Bharti into an interest-bearing escrow account that has been set up in a nationalised bank especially for that purpose. The regulator stated in an order that the escrow account(s) would establish a lien in favour of SEBI and that th...
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the country's market regulator, has announced the launch of an optional same-day (T+0) settlement cycle for a select group of 25 stocks starting March 28, as per a circular published on its website last Thursday. This new initiative, referred to as the beta version, is set to coexist with the traditional next-day (T+1) settlement cycle, where trades are settled within 24 hours of execution. The T+0 settlement option will be available for ...
Capital markets regulator Sebi on Thursday slapped a fine of Rs 48 lakh on eight entities, including promoters of United Polyfab Gujarat Ltd (UPGL), for manipulating the share prices of the company. These entities have to pay the penalty jointly and severally within 45 days, as per an order. The order came after Sebi conducted an investigation of UPGL and trading by certain entities in the scrip of the company, to ascertain whether there was any violation of the provisions of the PFUTP (Pr...
Sebi alerts investors about the growing trend of unregistered entities falsely claiming Sebi registration and offering unrealistic returns. Investors are advised to verify the registration status and consider the inherent risks associated with high-return investments. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has issued a warning to investors, cautioning them against investing money with unregistered entities that promise assured or exceptionally high returns on investments. This advi...
Capital markets regulator Sebi on Thursday issued orders of action against 15 guest experts of the Zee Business channel for unlawful trading. The entities made unlawful gains to the tune of Rs. 7.41 crore from such trades and the profit was shared with guest experts as per prior understanding, Sebi noted. The market regulator also asked the guest experts to pay Rs.7.41 crore. The guest experts appeared on the Zee Business channel from 1 February 2022 and 31 December 2022. "The facts of t...
Comments