News Details- (Get Professional Updates on Whatsapp, Msg on
8285393786) More
News
HC of Karnataka slaps a fine of Rs 1 lakh on Commissioner of Service Tax
The High Court recently imposed an ‘exemplary cost’ of Rs 1 lakh on the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals) Suresh Kumar, which he has to pay “from his personal funds”. The fine came after what the HC termed was a “total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Departmental authorities in this Court”.
The Department had failed to follow a tax Tribunal order to refund tax to a company. Instead, it went on to reject the Tribunal order and even defended this move before the High Court. The court called the officer ‘a threat to the society’.
The XL Health Corporation India Private Limited approached the High Court against the action of the Service Tax department. The Commissioner on an appeal in 2017 reiterated his stand of 2016 rejecting the refund of tax to the company. The company claimed refund on account of export of services rendered by it. The Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had set aside the 2016 order of the Commissioner and ruled in favour of the company. It had directed the Commissioner to quantify the tax amount to be returned.
When the company filed an appeal seeking return of tax for 2017 before the Commissioner, he rejected it again. He took note of the 2016 matter in which the Tribunal had set aside his order and said, “I have discussed the issue in detail (which order was set aside by the Tribunal) and do not find any reason to change my mind or findings therof and so see no reason or justification to set aside the Order in Original.” The Tribunal’s order of 2016 was not challenged by the Service Tax department either in the HC or SC. But it made the same kind of order for 2017.
When the issue was challenged by the company in the HC, “The Department has the audacity to file a statement of objection” saying “there were no new facts which necessitated going through the rigmarole or formality of hearing and is nothing but time wasting tactics being adopted by the petitioner.”
The HC in its judgement passed strictures against the Department saying it had thrown the principles of judicial discipline to the wind. The Commissioner “not only reiterated his own stand, which were set aside by the Tribunal but the same is sought to be defended by the Department.
The total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Department authorities in this Court should not be tolerated at all. It is this kind of lack of judicial discipline which if it goes unpunished, will lead to more litigation and chaos and such public servants are a threat to the society.”
The HC had during an earlier hearing of the case given time to the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Prashant Kumar Jha, to file an affidavit apologising for its move. But no affidavit was filed and the order of Suresh Kumar was also not withdrawn. The counsel for the Department told the court that Jha was transferred from Bengaluru to Delhi and so more time was needed to file the affidavit.
“This request adds insult to the injury. The writ petition therefore deserves to be allowed with exemplary costs,” the court said. Suresh Kumar was ordered to pay the fine before November 21, 2018. #casansaar (Source - Banglore Mirror)
The Department had failed to follow a tax Tribunal order to refund tax to a company. Instead, it went on to reject the Tribunal order and even defended this move before the High Court. The court called the officer ‘a threat to the society’.
The XL Health Corporation India Private Limited approached the High Court against the action of the Service Tax department. The Commissioner on an appeal in 2017 reiterated his stand of 2016 rejecting the refund of tax to the company. The company claimed refund on account of export of services rendered by it. The Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had set aside the 2016 order of the Commissioner and ruled in favour of the company. It had directed the Commissioner to quantify the tax amount to be returned.
When the company filed an appeal seeking return of tax for 2017 before the Commissioner, he rejected it again. He took note of the 2016 matter in which the Tribunal had set aside his order and said, “I have discussed the issue in detail (which order was set aside by the Tribunal) and do not find any reason to change my mind or findings therof and so see no reason or justification to set aside the Order in Original.” The Tribunal’s order of 2016 was not challenged by the Service Tax department either in the HC or SC. But it made the same kind of order for 2017.
When the issue was challenged by the company in the HC, “The Department has the audacity to file a statement of objection” saying “there were no new facts which necessitated going through the rigmarole or formality of hearing and is nothing but time wasting tactics being adopted by the petitioner.”
The HC in its judgement passed strictures against the Department saying it had thrown the principles of judicial discipline to the wind. The Commissioner “not only reiterated his own stand, which were set aside by the Tribunal but the same is sought to be defended by the Department.
The total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Department authorities in this Court should not be tolerated at all. It is this kind of lack of judicial discipline which if it goes unpunished, will lead to more litigation and chaos and such public servants are a threat to the society.”
The HC had during an earlier hearing of the case given time to the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Prashant Kumar Jha, to file an affidavit apologising for its move. But no affidavit was filed and the order of Suresh Kumar was also not withdrawn. The counsel for the Department told the court that Jha was transferred from Bengaluru to Delhi and so more time was needed to file the affidavit.
“This request adds insult to the injury. The writ petition therefore deserves to be allowed with exemplary costs,” the court said. Suresh Kumar was ordered to pay the fine before November 21, 2018. #casansaar (Source - Banglore Mirror)
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 893
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
Search News
News By Categories More Categories
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments