HC of Karnataka slaps a fine of Rs 1 lakh on Commissioner of Service Tax
Listen to this Article
The Department had failed to follow a tax Tribunal order to refund tax to a company. Instead, it went on to reject the Tribunal order and even defended this move before the High Court. The court called the officer ‘a threat to the society’.
The XL Health Corporation India Private Limited approached the High Court against the action of the Service Tax department. The Commissioner on an appeal in 2017 reiterated his stand of 2016 rejecting the refund of tax to the company. The company claimed refund on account of export of services rendered by it. The Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) had set aside the 2016 order of the Commissioner and ruled in favour of the company. It had directed the Commissioner to quantify the tax amount to be returned.
When the company filed an appeal seeking return of tax for 2017 before the Commissioner, he rejected it again. He took note of the 2016 matter in which the Tribunal had set aside his order and said, “I have discussed the issue in detail (which order was set aside by the Tribunal) and do not find any reason to change my mind or findings therof and so see no reason or justification to set aside the Order in Original.” The Tribunal’s order of 2016 was not challenged by the Service Tax department either in the HC or SC. But it made the same kind of order for 2017.
When the issue was challenged by the company in the HC, “The Department has the audacity to file a statement of objection” saying “there were no new facts which necessitated going through the rigmarole or formality of hearing and is nothing but time wasting tactics being adopted by the petitioner.”
The HC in its judgement passed strictures against the Department saying it had thrown the principles of judicial discipline to the wind. The Commissioner “not only reiterated his own stand, which were set aside by the Tribunal but the same is sought to be defended by the Department.
The total callous, negligent and disrespectful behaviour shown by the Department authorities in this Court should not be tolerated at all. It is this kind of lack of judicial discipline which if it goes unpunished, will lead to more litigation and chaos and such public servants are a threat to the society.”
The HC had during an earlier hearing of the case given time to the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax, Prashant Kumar Jha, to file an affidavit apologising for its move. But no affidavit was filed and the order of Suresh Kumar was also not withdrawn. The counsel for the Department told the court that Jha was transferred from Bengaluru to Delhi and so more time was needed to file the affidavit.
“This request adds insult to the injury. The writ petition therefore deserves to be allowed with exemplary costs,” the court said. Suresh Kumar was ordered to pay the fine before November 21, 2018. #casansaar (Source - Banglore Mirror)
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 911
In a setback to the Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust, the Supreme Court on Friday upheld an appellate tribunal’s ruling that the organisation is liable to pay service tax for charging an entry fee for organising Yoga camps, both residential and non-residential. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan refused to interfere with the October 5, 2023 decision of the Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).The bench, while dismissing the Trust&rsquo...
In a relief to IT companies, government has set aside a 10,000 crore rupee service tax demand notices on IT companies. In a statement, the Finance Ministry said, as a result, apprehensions about the negative effects on the software industry are without basis. The government's move came a day after IT companies raised the issue of tax demand with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley during the pre-budget consultations. The tax department had slapped service tax demand notices on about 200 info...
CBEC to Redistribute Cases in Jurisdictions to Reduce Pendency of cases with Commissioners (Appeal
In order to clear the pendency of cases as on 30th June 2017 before the Commissioners of Central Excise and Service Tax (Appeals), the CBEC will redistribute the cases pending in the jurisdiction of a Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, among other Commissioner rank officers posted in that jurisdiction. A notification and circular have been issued in this regard. #casansaar (Source - PIB)
Certain transitional issues arising with respect to payment of service tax after 30th June 2017 have been clarified by CBEC vide circular dated 28-9-2017. It has been clarified that in cases where service was received before 1-7-2017 and payment for the value of the service was also made before 1-7-2017, but the service tax was paid by 5th /6th July 2017, details of credit should be indicated in Part I of Form ST-3 by filing a revised return. In order to give compliant assessees who had...
Extension of the date of submission of the Form ST-3 for the period 1st October 2016 to 31st March 2017 from 25th April 2017 to 30th April 2017, Order No. 01/2017-Service Tax dt. 25-04-2017. www.casansaar.com


Comments