Tax Audits - Centre raises the bar on CAs
The Centre has once again put chartered accountants’ (CAs) fraternity on notice - this time on their attest functions on the income tax front.
Several changes are now being proposed – to be effective from June 1 -- on the eligibility criteria for CAs to undertake attestation (audit/certification) work under the income tax law.
These are to be implemented through a change in the meaning of an “accountant” in the income tax law—a proposal to this effect has been made in the latest budget.
The overall objective seems to be to avoid conflict of interest and enhance comfort to the revenue authorities on the findings of tax audit reports.
More rigour is being brought into the aspect of judging “independence” of CAs, whose audit/certification are usually accepted by Indian tax authorities.
With the audit/certification work of CAs intended to protect the interest of the revenue, the Centre is of the view that an auditor who is not independent cannot meaningfully discharge his function of protecting the interest of revenue.
So, the latest budget has now proposed that a person who is not eligible to be appointed as an auditor of a company will not be eligible to carry out attest functions under the income tax law.
Also, detailed restrictions have been proposed on CAs as regards tax audit reports on non-corporate assesses where they have financial interest either directly or through relatives.
CERTIFICATE OF PRACTICE
It is also now proposed that only CAs with full time certificate of practice could undertake attest functions under the income tax law.
This would mean that members of the CA Institute with part-time certificate of practice cannot legally attest reports for income tax purposes.
Currently, the income tax law—for the meaning of an accountant — does not distinguish between CAs holding a certificate of practice and others.
This was misinterpreted as if the reports can be issued by any CAs whether he holds the certificate of practice or not, according to G Ramaswamy, former CA Institute President.
Now, the proposed amendment clarifies that those who are holding a valid (full time) certificate of practice only are eligible to issue such reports, Ramaswamy told Business Line.
The CA Institute has already prohibited CAs with part time certificate of practice from carrying out attest functions, he said.
“Already CA institute has issued many guidelines for maintaining independence for CAs, including internal auditor should not be tax auditor. This proposed amendment to income tax law will give more clarity to users of CAs services”, Ramaswamy said.
This is aimed at avoiding any conflict of interest in the discharge of this important fiduciary duty, he said. (K.R.Srivats - The Hindu)
Category : Tax Audit | Comments : 1 | Hits : 4370
Get Free Daily Updates Via e-Mail on Income Tax, Service tax, Excise and Corporate law
- Income Tax Dept serves notices to salaried individuals for documentary proof to claim exemptions
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 - Update on allotment of Branches
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2021 Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2020 - Update on Allotment of Branches
- Police Atrocities towards CA in Faridabad - Its Time to be Unite
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates 2019
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- Bank Branch Audit 2022 Updates
- Bank Branch Statutory Audit Updates
- NFRA Imposes Monetary penalty of Rs 1 Crore on M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
- ICAI notifies earlier announced CA exam dates despite pending legal challenge before SC
- NFRA debars Auditors, imposes Rs 50 lakh penalties for lapses in Brightcom, CMIL cases
- GST Important Update - Enhancement in the GST Portal
- NFRA Slaps Rs 5 lakh Penalty on Audit Firm for lapses in Vikas WSP Audit Case
- CBDT extends due date for filing Form 10A/10AB upto 30th June, 2024
- RBI comes out with FEMA regulations for direct listing on international exchange
- RBI directs payment firms to track high-value, fishy transactions during elections
- NCLT orders insolvency proceedings against Subhash Chandra
- Income Tax dept starts drive to dispose of appeals, 0.54 million at last count
- Payment of MCA fees –electronic mode-regarding
- Budget '11-12' Parliament Completes Approval Exercise
- Satyam restrained from operating its accounts
- ICICI a foreign firm, subject to FDI norms: Govt
- Maha expects Rs 15 crore entertainment tax revenue from IPL
- CAG blames PMO for not acting against Kalmadi
- No service tax on visa facilitators: CBEC
- Provision of 15-minutes reading and planning time allowance to the candidates of Chartered Accountants Examinations
- Companies Bill to be taken up in Monsoon Session
- File Service Tax Return in time as Maximum Penalty increased 10 times to Rs. 20000

Comments
CA. NITIN BHARADWAJ
09-Mar-2015 , 04:33:20 pmCA doing concurrent audit of bank can be termed as an employee and hence should not do any statutory audit and hence TAX AUDIT also. banks are doing such cost saving measures and gullible CA are signing the concurrent audit report and the tax audit report also. now they cannot do such hanky panky.