“Imposition of penalty under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 when penalty under Section 76 thereof was waived off”
Listen to this Article
Imposition of penalty under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 when penalty under Section 76 thereof was waived off
We are sharing with you an important judgment of Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai, in the case of Garodia Special Steels Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad [2014-TIOL-2638-CESTAT-MUM] on following issue:
Issue:
Whether the imposition of penalty under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 is justified, when penalty under Section 76 was waived on the ground of reasonable cause?
Facts & background:
In the instant case, Garodia Special Steels Ltd. (“the Appellant”) paid Service tax under the category of Goods Transport Agency on reverse charge basis. However, during the audit of their unit, the reconciliation of ledger accounts with the Service Returns revealed that the Appellant had not paid the due Service tax during the periods 2007-2008 and April 2008 to December 2009. The Appellant paid the entire amount of Service tax before the issuance of Show Cause Notice.
Nonetheless proceedings were initiated and apart from upholding the Service tax demand, penalties were imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest. On appeal being filed to the Commissioner (Appeals) against imposition of penalty, the same was rejected. Being aggrieved, the Appellant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai.
Held:
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai while setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act held as under:
- Detection of non-payment of Service tax from the books of accounts maintained by the Appellant, indicates that the Appellant could not have any mala fide intention to evade payment of Service tax;
- The Adjudicating Authority waived penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act by taking cover of Section 80 thereof. Having found reasonable cause for waiving penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, there is no justification for imposing penalty under Section 77 and Section78 thereof.
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
Delhi:
Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket - 1,
Mayur Vihar, Phase - I,
Delhi – 110091, India
Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056
Mobile: +91 9810604563
Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com
Category : Service Tax | Comments : 0 | Hits : 2804
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX
CENVAT CREDIT ON SET TOP BOX INTRODUCTION Service providers have at least a Telephone in their office. They are paying service tax on the telephone charges. The service tax on telephone ...
NO KRISHI KALYAN CESS ON DEBTORS AS ON 13th MAY’ 2016 (PART -2) Read more at: http://www.casansaar.com/article-submit.htmlThe enabling provisions for KRISHI KALYAN CESS (KKC) are contained in ...
Krishi Kalyan Cess w.e.f. 01/06/2016
As you are aware that the Finance Act, 2016 has increased the service tax rate to include a new cess, namely Krishi Kalyan Cess, which is applicable w.e.f. 01/06/2016. The effective rate of service ta...


Comments